dc.creator | Pantić, Marijana | |
dc.creator | Živanović Miljković, Jelena | |
dc.creator | Milijić, Saša | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-08T10:54:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-08T10:54:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0354-4605 (Print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2406-0860 (Online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/512 | |
dc.description.abstract | Land use and building regulation within protected natural areas in Serbia is
specific in comparison to areas without this status. Since urban plans define the rules
and conditions limited to urban settlements and locations of national priority (e.g.
tourism resort in natural protected areas), other areas, including significant parts of
protected natural areas, rely on spatial plans, which often contain elements of detailed
urban planning (i.e. regulation and building rules). Preservation of ecologic and
environmental functions is a priority in protected natural areas (particularly in zones
of I and II level of protection), but they are also eligible for controlled development
purposes in zone of III level of protection. Due to large distance from administrative
centre and institutions responsible for building inspection, it is not rare case in Serbia
that illegal building in protected areas makes them more exposed to illegal actions.
Therefore, this paper focuses on the role of spatial plans in balancing between land
use and building in protected natural areas on the one hand and nature protection on
the other hand. In-depth analysis of chosen spatial plans, here is given a comprehensive
review of building and land use postulates, regulations and different levels of protection
applied in spatial planning. Starting from the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia 2010-
2020, analysis gives a major significance to four special purpose area spatial plans of
different kind: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve, Tisa River Multifunctional
Ecological Corridor, Kopaonik National Park and Vlasina Landscape of Exceptional
Features. Finally, there is shown diversity and systematisation of existing measures, and
contribution to understanding of challenges and recommendations on future
improvements of methodology in planning and implementation of plans in order to
enhance balance between development and protection. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | sr |
dc.publisher | University of Niš, Serbia | sr |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Technological Development (TD or TR)/36036/RS// | sr |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47014/RS// | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 17, No 2, 2019 | sr |
dc.subject | spatial planning | sr |
dc.subject | prostorno planiranje | sr |
dc.subject | protected natural areas | sr |
dc.subject | zaštićena prirodna dobra | sr |
dc.subject | land use | sr |
dc.subject | namena zemljišta | sr |
dc.subject | building regulations | sr |
dc.subject | pravila izgradnje | sr |
dc.subject | Serbia | sr |
dc.subject | Srbija | sr |
dc.title | Land Use and Building Regulations: the Case of Spatial Plans for Protected Natural Areas (Serbia) | en |
dc.type | article | sr |
dc.rights.license | BY-NC-ND | sr |
dcterms.abstract | Живановић Миљковић, Јелена; Милијић, Саша; Пантић, Маријана; | |
dc.citation.volume | 17 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.spage | 173 | |
dc.citation.epage | 187 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2298/FUACE190315010P | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2253/Facta_Universitatis_Article_Pantic_Zivanovic_Miljkovic_Milijic.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |