TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Perić, Ana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/743
AB  - This paper analyzes post-socialist industrial development and policy in the Western Balkans through the lens of its regional specialization and spatial concentration. Against a conceptual framework revolving around place-based industrial policy, and using the Concentration index (modified Herfindahl-Hirschman index) and location coefficients (Balassa index), a comparative analysis over three decades (1990–2020) highlights weak regional diversification and intra-regional integration of industrial activity. The findings offer a new industrial policy that transcends regional specialization and spatial concentration to address regional development, planning and governance. The concluding remarks reveal some basic paths toward effective and pro-European regional industrial policy in the Western Balkans.
PB  - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
T2  - Eastern European Economics
T1  - Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?
DO  - 10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Perić, Ana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "This paper analyzes post-socialist industrial development and policy in the Western Balkans through the lens of its regional specialization and spatial concentration. Against a conceptual framework revolving around place-based industrial policy, and using the Concentration index (modified Herfindahl-Hirschman index) and location coefficients (Balassa index), a comparative analysis over three decades (1990–2020) highlights weak regional diversification and intra-regional integration of industrial activity. The findings offer a new industrial policy that transcends regional specialization and spatial concentration to address regional development, planning and governance. The concluding remarks reveal some basic paths toward effective and pro-European regional industrial policy in the Western Balkans.",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group",
journal = "Eastern European Economics",
title = "Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?",
doi = "10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936"
}

Zeković, S.,& Perić, A.. (2023). Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?. in Eastern European Economics
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group..
https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936

Zeković S, Perić A. Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?. in Eastern European Economics. 2023;.
doi:10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936 .

Zeković, Slavka, Perić, Ana, "Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?" in Eastern European Economics (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/561
AB  - The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.
PB  - Regional AStudies Association
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Territory, Politics, Governance
T1  - Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
SP  - 527
EP  - 548
DO  - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.",
publisher = "Regional AStudies Association, Routledge",
journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance",
title = "Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront",
volume = "10",
number = "4",
pages = "527-548",
doi = "10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410"
}

Zeković, S.,& Maričić, T.. (2022). Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance
Regional AStudies Association., 10(4), 527-548.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410

Zeković S, Maričić T. Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance. 2022;10(4):527-548.
doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 .

Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, "Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront" in Territory, Politics, Governance, 10, no. 4 (2022):527-548,
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
AB  - The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe
IS  - 48
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT220603009H
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe",
number = "48",
pages = "1-10",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT220603009H"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2022). Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.(48), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium. 2022;(48):1-10.
doi:10.2298/SPAT220603009H .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe" in Spatium, no. 48 (2022):1-10,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Зековић, Славка
AU  - Хаџић, Мирољуб
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/583
AB  - У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја), јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику.
AB  - The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T2  - Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији
T1  - Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације
T1  - Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications
SP  - 27
EP  - 66
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Зековић, Славка and Хаџић, Мирољуб",
year = "2020",
abstract = "У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја), јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику., The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
journal = "Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији",
booktitle = "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације, Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications",
pages = "27-66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583"
}

Зековић, С.,& Хаџић, М.. (2020). Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије., 27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583

Зековић С, Хаџић М. Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији. 2020;:27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583 .

Зековић, Славка, Хаџић, Мирољуб, "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације" in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији (2020):27-66,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/565
AB  - The paper will analyze the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It will indicate the key issues of Serbian industry, explore the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development. An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy will be applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper will indicate global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. The work becomes less conditioned on distance and space-time continuum. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR to the territorial planning and governance.  The real opportunities for the Serbian industry will be given in the paper,  Serbian S3 and some recommendations for their improvement and territorial governance.
PB  - Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts
T1  - A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development
SP  - 86
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper will analyze the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It will indicate the key issues of Serbian industry, explore the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development. An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy will be applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper will indicate global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. The work becomes less conditioned on distance and space-time continuum. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR to the territorial planning and governance.  The real opportunities for the Serbian industry will be given in the paper,  Serbian S3 and some recommendations for their improvement and territorial governance.",
publisher = "Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts",
title = "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development",
pages = "86"
}

Zeković, S.. (2020). A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts
Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art., 86.

Zeković S. A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts. 2020;:86..

Zeković, Slavka, "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts (2020):86.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/564
AB  - The paper analyzes the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the
theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the
influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It is indicated the key issues of Serbian industry, explored the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development.An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy has been applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper has indicated global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the regions and cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR and industrial policy to the territorial planning and governance. The real opportunities for the Serbian industrial policy are given in the paper as well as some recommendations for its improvement.
PB  - Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings
T1  - A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development
SP  - 549
EP  - 562
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the
theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the
influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It is indicated the key issues of Serbian industry, explored the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development.An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy has been applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper has indicated global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the regions and cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR and industrial policy to the territorial planning and governance. The real opportunities for the Serbian industrial policy are given in the paper as well as some recommendations for its improvement.",
publisher = "Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings",
title = "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development",
pages = "549-562"
}

Zeković, S.. (2020). A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings
Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art., 549-562.

Zeković S. A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings. 2020;:549-562..

Zeković, Slavka, "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings (2020):549-562.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Petovar, Ksenija
AU  - Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/563
AB  - This paper explores the legalization of mass illegal and informal construction (IIC) in Serbia (with particular reference to the city of Belgrade). It analyzes the credibility of the socialist and post-socialist institutional frameworks on IIC predicated upon the “credibility thesis” – an evolutionary understanding of institutions and their path-dependent development. In the empirical analysis, the measures of state policies were interpreted, assessed, and summarized in accordance with the Credibility Scales and Intervention (CSI) checklist. During the 1960s, a restrictive urban policy and the impossibility of the socialist model to provide affordable residential space due to fast urbanization, IIC consequently became an alternative method for meeting housing needs. In the 1990s, the socialist development model was transformed into one that was post-socialist. A new wave of IIC ensued due to the privatization of land-use and tenancy rights, and its vast scale has been a key driver for accommodating flows of immigrants after the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During this period, the Serbian State stimulated policies that are more credible to facilitate, formalize, and condone IIC. It is concluded that IIC in Serbia cannot be fully averted while legalization policies have, to date, been unsuccessful and non-credible.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Cities
T1  - The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia
IS  - 97
SP  - 1
EP  - 12
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Petovar, Ksenija and Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper explores the legalization of mass illegal and informal construction (IIC) in Serbia (with particular reference to the city of Belgrade). It analyzes the credibility of the socialist and post-socialist institutional frameworks on IIC predicated upon the “credibility thesis” – an evolutionary understanding of institutions and their path-dependent development. In the empirical analysis, the measures of state policies were interpreted, assessed, and summarized in accordance with the Credibility Scales and Intervention (CSI) checklist. During the 1960s, a restrictive urban policy and the impossibility of the socialist model to provide affordable residential space due to fast urbanization, IIC consequently became an alternative method for meeting housing needs. In the 1990s, the socialist development model was transformed into one that was post-socialist. A new wave of IIC ensued due to the privatization of land-use and tenancy rights, and its vast scale has been a key driver for accommodating flows of immigrants after the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During this period, the Serbian State stimulated policies that are more credible to facilitate, formalize, and condone IIC. It is concluded that IIC in Serbia cannot be fully averted while legalization policies have, to date, been unsuccessful and non-credible.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Cities",
title = "The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia",
number = "97",
pages = "1-12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548"
}

Zeković, S., Petovar, K.,& Bin Md Saman, N.. (2020). The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia. in Cities
Elsevier.(97), 1-12.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548

Zeković S, Petovar K, Bin Md Saman N. The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia. in Cities. 2020;(97):1-12.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548 .

Zeković, Slavka, Petovar, Ksenija, Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham, "The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia" in Cities, no. 97 (2020):1-12,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548 . .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Милић, Ђорђе
AU  - Тркуља, Синиша
AU  - Радосављевић, Зоран
AU  - Чолић, Ратка
AU  - Максин, Марија
AU  - Зековић, Славка
AU  - Ненковић-Ризнић, Марина
AU  - Манић, Божидар
AU  - Џелебџић, Омиљена
AU  - Ђукић, Александар
AU  - Јокановић, Игор
AU  - Петрић, Јасна
AU  - Никовић, Ана
AU  - Даниловић Христић, Наташа
AU  - Бајић, Тања
AU  - Чолић, Наташа
AU  - Бранков, Борјан
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/790
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T1  - Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године)
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Милић, Ђорђе and Тркуља, Синиша and Радосављевић, Зоран and Чолић, Ратка and Максин, Марија and Зековић, Славка and Ненковић-Ризнић, Марина and Манић, Божидар and Џелебџић, Омиљена and Ђукић, Александар and Јокановић, Игор and Петрић, Јасна and Никовић, Ана and Даниловић Христић, Наташа and Бајић, Тања and Чолић, Наташа and Бранков, Борјан",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
title = "Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године)",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790"
}

Милић, Ђ., Тркуља, С., Радосављевић, З., Чолић, Р., Максин, М., Зековић, С., Ненковић-Ризнић, М., Манић, Б., Џелебџић, О., Ђукић, А., Јокановић, И., Петрић, Ј., Никовић, А., Даниловић Христић, Н., Бајић, Т., Чолић, Н.,& Бранков, Б.. (2019). Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године). 
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790

Милић Ђ, Тркуља С, Радосављевић З, Чолић Р, Максин М, Зековић С, Ненковић-Ризнић М, Манић Б, Џелебџић О, Ђукић А, Јокановић И, Петрић Ј, Никовић А, Даниловић Христић Н, Бајић Т, Чолић Н, Бранков Б. Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године). 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790 .

Милић, Ђорђе, Тркуља, Синиша, Радосављевић, Зоран, Чолић, Ратка, Максин, Марија, Зековић, Славка, Ненковић-Ризнић, Марина, Манић, Божидар, Џелебџић, Омиљена, Ђукић, Александар, Јокановић, Игор, Петрић, Јасна, Никовић, Ана, Даниловић Христић, Наташа, Бајић, Тања, Чолић, Наташа, Бранков, Борјан, "Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године)" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Зековић, Славка
AU  - Хаџић, Мирољуб
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/718
AB  - У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја),јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику.
AB  - The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post-socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T2  - Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији
T1  - Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације
T1  - Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications
IS  - Посебна издања, бр.88
SP  - 27
EP  - 66
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Зековић, Славка and Хаџић, Мирољуб",
year = "2019",
abstract = "У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја),јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику., The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post-socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
journal = "Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији",
booktitle = "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације, Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications",
number = "Посебна издања, бр.88",
pages = "27-66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718"
}

Зековић, С.,& Хаџић, М.. (2019). Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије.(Посебна издања, бр.88), 27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718

Зековић С, Хаџић М. Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији. 2019;(Посебна издања, бр.88):27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718 .

Зековић, Славка, Хаџић, Мирољуб, "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације" in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији, no. Посебна издања, бр.88 (2019):27-66,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/507
AB  - The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.
PB  - Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia
IS  - 41
SP  - 14
EP  - 22
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.",
publisher = "Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia",
number = "41",
pages = "14-22"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2019). Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium
Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia.(41), 14-22.

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium. 2019;(41):14-22..

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia" in Spatium, no. 41 (2019):14-22.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/466
AB  - This paper explores the economic and industrial development in Serbia, and the possibilities for their recovery based on the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The paper has two aims: first, to provide a brief review of the economic development in Serbia; and second, to give some recommendations for the re/neo-industrialization strategy or the Strategy Smart Specialization (S3) in accordance with the new European industrial policy (based on the 4IR and "research and innovation systems" - RISs). An analytical and conceptual framework has been applied for the understanding and improvement of a new industrial policy by S3. Research is based on the preliminary use of a data-driven approach in a multi-dimensional framework related to the 4IR. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention and promote the creation of innovative products and services in several domains. Some recommendations are also given for the preparation of S3 in line with the innovation-led growth. The new Serbian economy based on S3 should support sectoral modernization, competitiveness, and effective transformation in accordance with the requirements of the 4IR and the real possibilities for their implementation.
PB  - Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)
T1  - The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia
SP  - 399
EP  - 409
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper explores the economic and industrial development in Serbia, and the possibilities for their recovery based on the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The paper has two aims: first, to provide a brief review of the economic development in Serbia; and second, to give some recommendations for the re/neo-industrialization strategy or the Strategy Smart Specialization (S3) in accordance with the new European industrial policy (based on the 4IR and "research and innovation systems" - RISs). An analytical and conceptual framework has been applied for the understanding and improvement of a new industrial policy by S3. Research is based on the preliminary use of a data-driven approach in a multi-dimensional framework related to the 4IR. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention and promote the creation of innovative products and services in several domains. Some recommendations are also given for the preparation of S3 in line with the innovation-led growth. The new Serbian economy based on S3 should support sectoral modernization, competitiveness, and effective transformation in accordance with the requirements of the 4IR and the real possibilities for their implementation.",
publisher = "Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)",
title = "The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia",
pages = "399-409"
}

Zeković, S.. (2019). The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)
Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art., 399-409.

Zeković S. The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings). 2019;:399-409..

Zeković, Slavka, "The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings) (2019):399-409.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/508
AB  - The aim of the paper is to explore the perspectives of the new industrial policy of Serbia (in line with the Fourth Industrial revolution/4IR) and its un/predictable impacts on cities. It will discuss the
main requirements of the 4IR (the expected shifts, challenges and effects) and the European concept of the “Research and Innovation Systems”/RIS as the multi-dimensional framework for the national “Strategy of Smart Specialization”/S3. These concepts have an important role for urban development, urban policy and urban economy. The paper indicates that the relationship between the movement and allocation of capital and territoriality of political power is a global challenge, which creates spatial configurations, such as smart cities superstructures, urban mega-projects and infrastructures. It opens the question of how to adapt to the new economic order in line to 4IR, especially due to complexity of globalization risks, shifting boundaries of urban governability, creation of new urban structures, possible conflicts and uncertain self-governance of the cities. A conflict between two different views is often refracted in cities: the logic of capital and territorial (political) decision-making. The interdependence of the globalization and the urbanization can contribute to redefinition of the economic and industrial policies and their impact on reshaping of (smart) urban structures, i.e. governance before urban super-structures. An analytical and conceptual framework of the theory of globalization will be applied in the research of a new Serbian S3 and its impact assessment on urban development. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic fields, some innovative products and services, consequent urban changes, and provide a reliable assessment of implementation, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economy (jobless, sustainable, innovative, de-growth, sacrificing growth and deceptive growth) in an underdeveloped country. The paper offers some recommendations for perspectival intelligence-smart thinking about the future, real, and critical planning and governance.
PB  - Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia
PB  - Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography
C3  - Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city
T1  - The Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development
SP  - 301
EP  - 301
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to explore the perspectives of the new industrial policy of Serbia (in line with the Fourth Industrial revolution/4IR) and its un/predictable impacts on cities. It will discuss the
main requirements of the 4IR (the expected shifts, challenges and effects) and the European concept of the “Research and Innovation Systems”/RIS as the multi-dimensional framework for the national “Strategy of Smart Specialization”/S3. These concepts have an important role for urban development, urban policy and urban economy. The paper indicates that the relationship between the movement and allocation of capital and territoriality of political power is a global challenge, which creates spatial configurations, such as smart cities superstructures, urban mega-projects and infrastructures. It opens the question of how to adapt to the new economic order in line to 4IR, especially due to complexity of globalization risks, shifting boundaries of urban governability, creation of new urban structures, possible conflicts and uncertain self-governance of the cities. A conflict between two different views is often refracted in cities: the logic of capital and territorial (political) decision-making. The interdependence of the globalization and the urbanization can contribute to redefinition of the economic and industrial policies and their impact on reshaping of (smart) urban structures, i.e. governance before urban super-structures. An analytical and conceptual framework of the theory of globalization will be applied in the research of a new Serbian S3 and its impact assessment on urban development. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic fields, some innovative products and services, consequent urban changes, and provide a reliable assessment of implementation, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economy (jobless, sustainable, innovative, de-growth, sacrificing growth and deceptive growth) in an underdeveloped country. The paper offers some recommendations for perspectival intelligence-smart thinking about the future, real, and critical planning and governance.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia, Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography",
journal = "Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city",
title = "The Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development",
pages = "301-301"
}

Zeković, S.. (2019). The Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development. in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city
Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia., 301-301.

Zeković S. The Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development. in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city. 2019;:301-301..

Zeković, Slavka, "The Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development" in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city (2019):301-301.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Bajić, Tanja
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/364
AB  - Like most European cities, cities in South-east Europe (SEE) have been growing throughout the 20th century, however, since the end of the 1980s, the mechanisms of urban growth and expansion have changed radically: from development fully determined by central planning to market-led urban development. This paper examines how planning in large SEE cities is coping with the challenge to balance the action of the market and achieve planning goals relating to the form of urban growth and expansion. As case studies we analyse the master plans of Sofia and Belgrade and their implementation. We have two research questions: first, whether planning in the two cities has considered the role of the market when defining its objectives, measures and solutions regarding the forms of urban growth and the development of in suburban areas, and, second, whether planning has been able to influence the market or cooperate with it in order to achieve its objectives in suburban development.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade
IS  - 39
SP  - 38
EP  - 46
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT1839038S
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Slaev, Aleksandar and Zeković, Slavka and Kovachev, Atanas and Maričić, Tamara and Bajić, Tanja",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Like most European cities, cities in South-east Europe (SEE) have been growing throughout the 20th century, however, since the end of the 1980s, the mechanisms of urban growth and expansion have changed radically: from development fully determined by central planning to market-led urban development. This paper examines how planning in large SEE cities is coping with the challenge to balance the action of the market and achieve planning goals relating to the form of urban growth and expansion. As case studies we analyse the master plans of Sofia and Belgrade and their implementation. We have two research questions: first, whether planning in the two cities has considered the role of the market when defining its objectives, measures and solutions regarding the forms of urban growth and the development of in suburban areas, and, second, whether planning has been able to influence the market or cooperate with it in order to achieve its objectives in suburban development.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade",
number = "39",
pages = "38-46",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT1839038S"
}

Slaev, A., Zeković, S., Kovachev, A., Maričić, T.,& Bajić, T.. (2018). Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia.(39), 38-46.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839038S

Slaev A, Zeković S, Kovachev A, Maričić T, Bajić T. Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade. in Spatium. 2018;(39):38-46.
doi:10.2298/SPAT1839038S .

Slaev, Aleksandar, Zeković, Slavka, Kovachev, Atanas, Maričić, Tamara, Bajić, Tanja, "Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade" in Spatium, no. 39 (2018):38-46,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839038S . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://www.spuds.edu.rs/downloads/2eng.pdf.
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/363
AB  - The aim of this paper is to provide a systematized overview of urban land policy in Serbia, primarily regarding the impact of key contextual factors (historical, institutional, legal, etc.). Various historical and developmental contexts have caused regulation changes concerning construction land and its impact on the urban development in Serbia from the mid-19th century to the beginning of the 1990s. The analysis starts with an overview of the theoretical background of urban development policy and land regulation, followed by a brief reflection on the impact of key historical and legislative factors focused on the post-socialist period. The analysis of the urban land policy in the post-socialist period includes: key legislation; ownership status of construction land and property rights; conversion of ownership status; general policy instruments; key urban land management issues in Serbian cities; and a preliminary evaluation of the implementation effects of the existing urban land system in Serbia. Several research methods have been applied here, viz., the conceptual benchmarking framework for the dominant legal doctrine; a general qualitative analysis of the contemporary context; institutional and comparative analyses, etc. Although the former socialist concept of the welfare state has been transformed into a neoliberal concept in a short period, there is an evident delay in the reforms of the Serbian urban land policy. The paper presents numerous findings regarding the impact of the current system and practice on the general urban land policy in Serbia, while also focusing on the concomitant developments in the Belgrade Area. The paper concludes with the recommendations regarding the harmonisation and innovation of urban land policy and urban development policy in Serbia in the post-socialist era.
PB  - Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Support to process of urban development
T1  - Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors
SP  - 29
EP  - 58
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to provide a systematized overview of urban land policy in Serbia, primarily regarding the impact of key contextual factors (historical, institutional, legal, etc.). Various historical and developmental contexts have caused regulation changes concerning construction land and its impact on the urban development in Serbia from the mid-19th century to the beginning of the 1990s. The analysis starts with an overview of the theoretical background of urban development policy and land regulation, followed by a brief reflection on the impact of key historical and legislative factors focused on the post-socialist period. The analysis of the urban land policy in the post-socialist period includes: key legislation; ownership status of construction land and property rights; conversion of ownership status; general policy instruments; key urban land management issues in Serbian cities; and a preliminary evaluation of the implementation effects of the existing urban land system in Serbia. Several research methods have been applied here, viz., the conceptual benchmarking framework for the dominant legal doctrine; a general qualitative analysis of the contemporary context; institutional and comparative analyses, etc. Although the former socialist concept of the welfare state has been transformed into a neoliberal concept in a short period, there is an evident delay in the reforms of the Serbian urban land policy. The paper presents numerous findings regarding the impact of the current system and practice on the general urban land policy in Serbia, while also focusing on the concomitant developments in the Belgrade Area. The paper concludes with the recommendations regarding the harmonisation and innovation of urban land policy and urban development policy in Serbia in the post-socialist era.",
publisher = "Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Support to process of urban development",
booktitle = "Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors",
pages = "29-58"
}

Zeković, S.,& Vujošević, M.. (2018). Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors. in Support to process of urban development
Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne., 29-58.

Zeković S, Vujošević M. Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors. in Support to process of urban development. 2018;:29-58..

Zeković, Slavka, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors" in Support to process of urban development (2018):29-58.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/357
AB  - The research analyzed the theoretical and methodological background of urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instrument of urban planning and development, with specific reference to the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In analysis we combined a contextually appropriate ap-proach, some elements of the phronetic planning approach and the benchmarking analysis of megaproject planning and development. BWP induced a change of the institutional framework (introduction of specific legal and policy instruments), as a key source of future changes in the metropolitan tissue. Preliminary impact assessment of the BWP indicates: slow development & economic effects, low transparency, social inequalities, marginal social mobilization and weak networks between the key actors, public funds overuse, impact on law-making, displacement impacts, high public financial risk, deep urban transformations, environmental impacts, medium-technological modernization, etc. This research highlights the differences in the political, institutional, social and economic environment that shape the BWP. It provides recommendations for future research and application, improvement of planning approach and continuing in-depth analysis for managing the undesirable consequences of the UMPs, including the determination of the interplay between different pools of power.
PB  - Cham : Springer
T2  - Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact
T1  - Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront
SP  - 153
EP  - 164
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The research analyzed the theoretical and methodological background of urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instrument of urban planning and development, with specific reference to the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In analysis we combined a contextually appropriate ap-proach, some elements of the phronetic planning approach and the benchmarking analysis of megaproject planning and development. BWP induced a change of the institutional framework (introduction of specific legal and policy instruments), as a key source of future changes in the metropolitan tissue. Preliminary impact assessment of the BWP indicates: slow development & economic effects, low transparency, social inequalities, marginal social mobilization and weak networks between the key actors, public funds overuse, impact on law-making, displacement impacts, high public financial risk, deep urban transformations, environmental impacts, medium-technological modernization, etc. This research highlights the differences in the political, institutional, social and economic environment that shape the BWP. It provides recommendations for future research and application, improvement of planning approach and continuing in-depth analysis for managing the undesirable consequences of the UMPs, including the determination of the interplay between different pools of power.",
publisher = "Cham : Springer",
journal = "Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact",
booktitle = "Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront",
pages = "153-164",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13"
}

Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Vujošević, M.. (2018). Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront. in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact
Cham : Springer., 153-164.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13

Zeković S, Maričić T, Vujošević M. Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront. in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact. 2018;:153-164.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13 .

Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront" in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact (2018):153-164,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar D.
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Daskalova, Diliana
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/295
AB  - This paper studies the changing roles of planning and the market in the context of urban growth and suburbanization in the capitals of Serbia and Bulgaria, specifically with regard to the socio-economic changes experienced in Southeast Europe over the past decades. With a focus on the post-socialist period, the work also examines specific features of the socialist period, so as to make important distinctions between the two. The research question in this paper is: Is planning or the market responsible for the form of growth that has occurred in Sofia and Belgrade? One methodological problem for the study is that in reality, most urban processes are to a degree both market driven and centrally planned. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish between the distinct roles and outcomes of planning and the market. To solve this problem, the paper analyzes situations in which either planning or the market is dominant, so as to be able to clearly determine the impact of each mechanism on the resultant development. The paper concludes that urban growth and suburbanization are generally engendered by market forces, whereas the role of planning is to improve and refine the action of the market. When planning ignores the market, it results in failed or inefficient urban forms. However when planning is absent, urban development fails to meet reasonable standards.
PB  - Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia
VL  - 1
IS  - 37
SP  - 34
EP  - 41
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT1737034K
UR  - Konv_329
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovachev, Atanas and Slaev, Aleksandar D. and Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Daskalova, Diliana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper studies the changing roles of planning and the market in the context of urban growth and suburbanization in the capitals of Serbia and Bulgaria, specifically with regard to the socio-economic changes experienced in Southeast Europe over the past decades. With a focus on the post-socialist period, the work also examines specific features of the socialist period, so as to make important distinctions between the two. The research question in this paper is: Is planning or the market responsible for the form of growth that has occurred in Sofia and Belgrade? One methodological problem for the study is that in reality, most urban processes are to a degree both market driven and centrally planned. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish between the distinct roles and outcomes of planning and the market. To solve this problem, the paper analyzes situations in which either planning or the market is dominant, so as to be able to clearly determine the impact of each mechanism on the resultant development. The paper concludes that urban growth and suburbanization are generally engendered by market forces, whereas the role of planning is to improve and refine the action of the market. When planning ignores the market, it results in failed or inefficient urban forms. However when planning is absent, urban development fails to meet reasonable standards.",
publisher = "Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia",
volume = "1",
number = "37",
pages = "34-41",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT1737034K",
url = "Konv_329"
}

Kovachev, A., Slaev, A. D., Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Daskalova, D.. (2017). The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia. in Spatium
Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia., 1(37), 34-41.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737034K
Konv_329

Kovachev A, Slaev AD, Zeković S, Maričić T, Daskalova D. The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia. in Spatium. 2017;1(37):34-41.
doi:10.2298/SPAT1737034K
Konv_329 .

Kovachev, Atanas, Slaev, Aleksandar D., Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Daskalova, Diliana, "The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia" in Spatium, 1, no. 37 (2017):34-41,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737034K .,
Konv_329 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar D.
AU  - Nikolov, Petar
AU  - Daskalova, Diliana
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Petrić, Jasna
AU  - Krunić, Nikola
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Bajić, Tanja
AU  - Salvemini, Mauro
AU  - Berardi, Laura
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/413
AB  - The paper explores the problems of sustainable and resilient development of the cities in Eastern and South-east Europe on the examples of Sofia, Belgrade and Rome and their urban regions. The research draws comparisons to the forms, patterns and mechanisms of their development.
PB  - Varna : Varna free university
PB  - Belgrade: Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1
T1  - Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market
SP  - 13
EP  - 136
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Kovachev, Atanas and Slaev, Aleksandar D. and Nikolov, Petar and Daskalova, Diliana and Vujošević, Miodrag and Zeković, Slavka and Petrić, Jasna and Krunić, Nikola and Maričić, Tamara and Bajić, Tanja and Salvemini, Mauro and Berardi, Laura",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The paper explores the problems of sustainable and resilient development of the cities in Eastern and South-east Europe on the examples of Sofia, Belgrade and Rome and their urban regions. The research draws comparisons to the forms, patterns and mechanisms of their development.",
publisher = "Varna : Varna free university, Belgrade: Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1",
booktitle = "Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market",
pages = "13-136",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413"
}

Kovachev, A., Slaev, A. D., Nikolov, P., Daskalova, D., Vujošević, M., Zeković, S., Petrić, J., Krunić, N., Maričić, T., Bajić, T., Salvemini, M.,& Berardi, L.. (2016). Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1
Varna : Varna free university., 13-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413

Kovachev A, Slaev AD, Nikolov P, Daskalova D, Vujošević M, Zeković S, Petrić J, Krunić N, Maričić T, Bajić T, Salvemini M, Berardi L. Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1. 2016;:13-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413 .

Kovachev, Atanas, Slaev, Aleksandar D., Nikolov, Petar, Daskalova, Diliana, Vujošević, Miodrag, Zeković, Slavka, Petrić, Jasna, Krunić, Nikola, Maričić, Tamara, Bajić, Tanja, Salvemini, Mauro, Berardi, Laura, "Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1 (2016):13-136,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/395
AB  - This contribution consists of two parts. In the first part, some comments are extended on the respective roles and contents of two key international documents in this area, viz., International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning (Draft, UN Habitat, 2015), and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (2007). In the second part, some guidelines for the transformation of urban land policy and tools for limiting urban sprawl are presented and briefly interpreted, both traditional instruments and tools, and some which are more innovative and flexible. At the end of the paper we suggest that all of the documents mentioned (guidelines, charters, strategies, etc.) may fairly easily be implemented in the areas which are our main interest.
PB  - Varna : Varna Free University
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
T1  - Some guidelines on limiting urban sprawl
SP  - 153
EP  - 161
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This contribution consists of two parts. In the first part, some comments are extended on the respective roles and contents of two key international documents in this area, viz., International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning (Draft, UN Habitat, 2015), and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (2007). In the second part, some guidelines for the transformation of urban land policy and tools for limiting urban sprawl are presented and briefly interpreted, both traditional instruments and tools, and some which are more innovative and flexible. At the end of the paper we suggest that all of the documents mentioned (guidelines, charters, strategies, etc.) may fairly easily be implemented in the areas which are our main interest.",
publisher = "Varna : Varna Free University, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2",
booktitle = "Some guidelines on limiting urban sprawl",
pages = "153-161"
}

Zeković, S.,& Vujošević, M.. (2016). Some guidelines on limiting urban sprawl. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
Varna : Varna Free University., 153-161.

Zeković S, Vujošević M. Some guidelines on limiting urban sprawl. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2. 2016;:153-161..

Zeković, Slavka, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Some guidelines on limiting urban sprawl" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2 (2016):153-161.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/396
AB  - This contribution represents a revised version of reports for TURaS. It is comprised of two parts. In the first part, a number of national and local legal provisions on the utilization of agricultural and forest lands, respective conversion into urban (construction) lands and zoning in Serbia is presented. In the second part, the provisions of some national and local (Belgrade) strategic documents with regard to land use and urban construction policy are briefly discussed.
PB  - Varna : Varna Free University
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
T1  - Survey of planning documents - standards and regulations, spatial and master plans, plans for regional development
SP  - 25
EP  - 59
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This contribution represents a revised version of reports for TURaS. It is comprised of two parts. In the first part, a number of national and local legal provisions on the utilization of agricultural and forest lands, respective conversion into urban (construction) lands and zoning in Serbia is presented. In the second part, the provisions of some national and local (Belgrade) strategic documents with regard to land use and urban construction policy are briefly discussed.",
publisher = "Varna : Varna Free University, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2",
booktitle = "Survey of planning documents - standards and regulations, spatial and master plans, plans for regional development",
pages = "25-59"
}

Zeković, S.,& Vujošević, M.. (2016). Survey of planning documents - standards and regulations, spatial and master plans, plans for regional development. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
Varna : Varna Free University., 25-59.

Zeković S, Vujošević M. Survey of planning documents - standards and regulations, spatial and master plans, plans for regional development. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2. 2016;:25-59..

Zeković, Slavka, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Survey of planning documents - standards and regulations, spatial and master plans, plans for regional development" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2 (2016):25-59.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/397
AB  - This contribution represents a report on the research for task 5.5 on the relations between market and regional & urban planning. The paper have applied the market analysis of housing in Belgrade - the key principles and the practice of urban land management (so-called "stratified demand" aspect); a preliminary analysis and assessment of housing market in  the Belgrade metropolitan area, and basic market indicators for urban land and real estate.
PB  - Varna: Varna Free University
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
T1  - Market analysis of housing in Belgrade
SP  - 97
EP  - 119
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Vujošević, Miodrag and Maričić, Tamara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This contribution represents a report on the research for task 5.5 on the relations between market and regional & urban planning. The paper have applied the market analysis of housing in Belgrade - the key principles and the practice of urban land management (so-called "stratified demand" aspect); a preliminary analysis and assessment of housing market in  the Belgrade metropolitan area, and basic market indicators for urban land and real estate.",
publisher = "Varna: Varna Free University, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2",
booktitle = "Market analysis of housing in Belgrade",
pages = "97-119"
}

Zeković, S., Vujošević, M.,& Maričić, T.. (2016). Market analysis of housing in Belgrade. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
Varna: Varna Free University., 97-119.

Zeković S, Vujošević M, Maričić T. Market analysis of housing in Belgrade. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2. 2016;:97-119..

Zeković, Slavka, Vujošević, Miodrag, Maričić, Tamara, "Market analysis of housing in Belgrade" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2 (2016):97-119.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/398
AB  - The key aim of this contribution is to present the indicandum (the indicated issues, that is, urban sprawl and urban land) which are usually measured by a
number of indicators, the criteria for selection variables, the identification and
classification of the key indicators (quantitative) and their description. Also, a
concomitant aim is to derive some quantitative indicators critical for urban sprawl and urban land policy. As for the methodology used here for the preliminary identification of the indicators in question, the criteria are derived from standard evaluation of limit values and goals of, while the indicators are derived from measurements. Both concepts define the means or tools which have been used for the collection, analysis, evaluation and comparison of information about different issues, as well as tools for the integrated impact analysis of urban processes on urban land-use and policy. We have defined a preliminary set of indicators for urban sprawl, urban land-use and concomitant policy, grouped into five categories: 1) Key indicators of urban sprawl and urban land; 2) Anticipatory indicators of urban sprawl; 3)  Basic market indicators of urban land and real estate; 4) Indicators of multi-functional urban land-use; and 5) Composite indicators (indices).
PB  - Varna: Varna Free University
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
T1  - Indicators of the urban sprawl and urban land policy
SP  - 185
EP  - 204
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The key aim of this contribution is to present the indicandum (the indicated issues, that is, urban sprawl and urban land) which are usually measured by a
number of indicators, the criteria for selection variables, the identification and
classification of the key indicators (quantitative) and their description. Also, a
concomitant aim is to derive some quantitative indicators critical for urban sprawl and urban land policy. As for the methodology used here for the preliminary identification of the indicators in question, the criteria are derived from standard evaluation of limit values and goals of, while the indicators are derived from measurements. Both concepts define the means or tools which have been used for the collection, analysis, evaluation and comparison of information about different issues, as well as tools for the integrated impact analysis of urban processes on urban land-use and policy. We have defined a preliminary set of indicators for urban sprawl, urban land-use and concomitant policy, grouped into five categories: 1) Key indicators of urban sprawl and urban land; 2) Anticipatory indicators of urban sprawl; 3)  Basic market indicators of urban land and real estate; 4) Indicators of multi-functional urban land-use; and 5) Composite indicators (indices).",
publisher = "Varna: Varna Free University, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2",
booktitle = "Indicators of the urban sprawl and urban land policy",
pages = "185-204"
}

Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Vujošević, M.. (2016). Indicators of the urban sprawl and urban land policy. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2
Varna: Varna Free University., 185-204.

Zeković S, Maričić T, Vujošević M. Indicators of the urban sprawl and urban land policy. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2. 2016;:185-204..

Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Indicators of the urban sprawl and urban land policy" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volume 2 (2016):185-204.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Cvetinović, Marija
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/409
AB  - The paper explores the transformation of housing regulations and policies related to the changes in Serbia's historical and post-socialist context and its effects on the urban development of the Belgrade Metropolitan Area (BMA). The socialist concept of the welfare state was transformed in a very short time into a neoliberal economic concept, with deregulation of the housing legislation, especially by mass privatization of social (public) housing stocks. In the post-socialist era, four main types of housing policies have been identified: 1) fast and total privatisation of state-owned dwellings; 2) vast illegal housing construction; 3) dynamic growth of commercial housing, and 4) slow and limited growth of a new social housing policy. The changes to the housing laws during the transitional period include major negative implications of housing policies on the urban development policy of the BMA, and are as follows: 1) the privatisation of 266,500 state-owned dwellings for a pittance, resulting in only 1.5% of public-owned dwellings in Serbia (2.18% in the BMA); 2) vast illegal housing (1.4 million of totally 4.6 million buildings in Serbia; 0.2 million only in the BMA); 3) inefficient new social housing policy with a symbolic number of new residential units, and 4) extremely inefficient urban land use as a consequence of ineffective residential, urban and other policies (in the BMA, urban land consumption increased to 670 m2/p.c. in 2012, showing extremely inefficient urban land-use compared to the European level). These findings demonstrate a highly unsuitable post-socialist mode of housing policy transformation (by changing the previous laws according to a strong neoliberal course) and also show the patterns of short-term policies (i.e. privatisation) with marginal financial effects, very limited success of new social housing, and socially unsustainable illegal housing and urban policies.
PB  - Den Haag : Eleven International Publishing - Boom Uitgevers Den Haag
T2  - Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law. Volumen 1
T1  - Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post Socialist City: The Example of Belgrade
SP  - 41
EP  - 64
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Cvetinović, Marija",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The paper explores the transformation of housing regulations and policies related to the changes in Serbia's historical and post-socialist context and its effects on the urban development of the Belgrade Metropolitan Area (BMA). The socialist concept of the welfare state was transformed in a very short time into a neoliberal economic concept, with deregulation of the housing legislation, especially by mass privatization of social (public) housing stocks. In the post-socialist era, four main types of housing policies have been identified: 1) fast and total privatisation of state-owned dwellings; 2) vast illegal housing construction; 3) dynamic growth of commercial housing, and 4) slow and limited growth of a new social housing policy. The changes to the housing laws during the transitional period include major negative implications of housing policies on the urban development policy of the BMA, and are as follows: 1) the privatisation of 266,500 state-owned dwellings for a pittance, resulting in only 1.5% of public-owned dwellings in Serbia (2.18% in the BMA); 2) vast illegal housing (1.4 million of totally 4.6 million buildings in Serbia; 0.2 million only in the BMA); 3) inefficient new social housing policy with a symbolic number of new residential units, and 4) extremely inefficient urban land use as a consequence of ineffective residential, urban and other policies (in the BMA, urban land consumption increased to 670 m2/p.c. in 2012, showing extremely inefficient urban land-use compared to the European level). These findings demonstrate a highly unsuitable post-socialist mode of housing policy transformation (by changing the previous laws according to a strong neoliberal course) and also show the patterns of short-term policies (i.e. privatisation) with marginal financial effects, very limited success of new social housing, and socially unsustainable illegal housing and urban policies.",
publisher = "Den Haag : Eleven International Publishing - Boom Uitgevers Den Haag",
journal = "Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law. Volumen 1",
booktitle = "Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post Socialist City: The Example of Belgrade",
pages = "41-64"
}

Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Cvetinović, M.. (2016). Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post Socialist City: The Example of Belgrade. in Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law. Volumen 1
Den Haag : Eleven International Publishing - Boom Uitgevers Den Haag., 41-64.

Zeković S, Maričić T, Cvetinović M. Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post Socialist City: The Example of Belgrade. in Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law. Volumen 1. 2016;:41-64..

Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Cvetinović, Marija, "Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post Socialist City: The Example of Belgrade" in Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law. Volumen 1 (2016):41-64.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/277
AB  - This chapter summarizes the key problems of development changes as well as industrial development and its degradation, and provides an analysis of industrial development in the Danube and Belgrade regions (level of NUTS 2). The analysis includes two components: (1) economic growth and developmental changes; and (2) territorial concentration. In the chapter are identified the results of development changes and economic growth by applying shift-share analysis. The chapter shows that the consideration of national share, industrial mix, and regional share in total shift-share employment growth of the regions indicate a strong process of deindustrialization. An allocative component of regional economic growth has a positive value reflecting above-average industrial productivity. Comparative analysis of the regional industrial territorial concentration is based on location quotient. The results indicate a decrease of the territorial industrial concentration in the two Serbian regions.
PB  - Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin
C3  - Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference nn Industrial Economics System and Industrial Secur
T1  - Impact of Industrial Development on the Spatial Structures in the Danube Region in Serbia
SP  - 155
EP  - 160
DO  - 10.1007/978-981-287-655-3_20
UR  - Konv_299
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This chapter summarizes the key problems of development changes as well as industrial development and its degradation, and provides an analysis of industrial development in the Danube and Belgrade regions (level of NUTS 2). The analysis includes two components: (1) economic growth and developmental changes; and (2) territorial concentration. In the chapter are identified the results of development changes and economic growth by applying shift-share analysis. The chapter shows that the consideration of national share, industrial mix, and regional share in total shift-share employment growth of the regions indicate a strong process of deindustrialization. An allocative component of regional economic growth has a positive value reflecting above-average industrial productivity. Comparative analysis of the regional industrial territorial concentration is based on location quotient. The results indicate a decrease of the territorial industrial concentration in the two Serbian regions.",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin",
journal = "Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference nn Industrial Economics System and Industrial Secur",
title = "Impact of Industrial Development on the Spatial Structures in the Danube Region in Serbia",
pages = "155-160",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-287-655-3_20",
url = "Konv_299"
}

Zeković, S.. (2016). Impact of Industrial Development on the Spatial Structures in the Danube Region in Serbia. in Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference nn Industrial Economics System and Industrial Secur
Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin., 155-160.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-655-3_20
Konv_299

Zeković S. Impact of Industrial Development on the Spatial Structures in the Danube Region in Serbia. in Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference nn Industrial Economics System and Industrial Secur. 2016;:155-160.
doi:10.1007/978-981-287-655-3_20
Konv_299 .

Zeković, Slavka, "Impact of Industrial Development on the Spatial Structures in the Danube Region in Serbia" in Proceedings of 2015 2nd International Conference nn Industrial Economics System and Industrial Secur (2016):155-160,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-655-3_20 .,
Konv_299 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/280
AB  - The key objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the historical context and development of construction land and its relations to urban development in Serbia. The paper discusses global developmental contexts, legal frameworks and changes of the Serbian urban land policy from the end of the 19th century until today. We emphasize the delay of reforms in Serbian urban land policy as a consequence of the complexities of legal framework, especially under the conditions of the economic and societal transformation (after 2000). The paper presents the original results of the historical changes of the legal system in the field of urban land policy and its connection with the system of spatial/urban planning. Also, we provide recommendations for the future urban land policy, which include further transformations of the legal framework in the post-socialist/transitional period. There is a long lasting need for readjusting the current planning and urban land policy in Serbia, as well as for introducing new urban land policy tools.
PB  - Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - A historical prolegomenon of the legal framework and urban land policy in serbia as a basis for urban development
VL  - 1
IS  - 36
SP  - 67
EP  - 74
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT1636067Z
UR  - Konv_332
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The key objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the historical context and development of construction land and its relations to urban development in Serbia. The paper discusses global developmental contexts, legal frameworks and changes of the Serbian urban land policy from the end of the 19th century until today. We emphasize the delay of reforms in Serbian urban land policy as a consequence of the complexities of legal framework, especially under the conditions of the economic and societal transformation (after 2000). The paper presents the original results of the historical changes of the legal system in the field of urban land policy and its connection with the system of spatial/urban planning. Also, we provide recommendations for the future urban land policy, which include further transformations of the legal framework in the post-socialist/transitional period. There is a long lasting need for readjusting the current planning and urban land policy in Serbia, as well as for introducing new urban land policy tools.",
publisher = "Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "A historical prolegomenon of the legal framework and urban land policy in serbia as a basis for urban development",
volume = "1",
number = "36",
pages = "67-74",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT1636067Z",
url = "Konv_332"
}

Zeković, S.,& Maričić, T.. (2016). A historical prolegomenon of the legal framework and urban land policy in serbia as a basis for urban development. in Spatium
Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia., 1(36), 67-74.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1636067Z
Konv_332

Zeković S, Maričić T. A historical prolegomenon of the legal framework and urban land policy in serbia as a basis for urban development. in Spatium. 2016;1(36):67-74.
doi:10.2298/SPAT1636067Z
Konv_332 .

Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, "A historical prolegomenon of the legal framework and urban land policy in serbia as a basis for urban development" in Spatium, 1, no. 36 (2016):67-74,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1636067Z .,
Konv_332 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Müller, Harald
AU  - Wehrmann, Babette
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Fürst, Ariana
AU  - Begović, Branko
AU  - Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph
AU  - Božić, Branko
AU  - Ferenčak, Miodrag
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://www.urbanlandmanagement.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Six-Years-of-Strengthening-of-Local-Land-Management-Urban-Module_ENG.pdf
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/386
AB  - After 6 years of Serbian-German cooperation in the field of urban land management, some
steps towards sustainable urban land management in Serbia have been taken. Existing
instruments have been adapted and new ones introduced with the objective to improve
the ecological, economic and social sustainability of urban land management processes
and their outcomes. Several new instruments, planning and management approaches
have been tested, professionals have been trained, and the regulatory framework has
been partly adjusted.
PB  - Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade
PB  - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office Serbia
T1  - Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Müller, Harald and Wehrmann, Babette and Čolić, Ratka and Fürst, Ariana and Begović, Branko and Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph and Božić, Branko and Ferenčak, Miodrag and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2015",
abstract = "After 6 years of Serbian-German cooperation in the field of urban land management, some
steps towards sustainable urban land management in Serbia have been taken. Existing
instruments have been adapted and new ones introduced with the objective to improve
the ecological, economic and social sustainability of urban land management processes
and their outcomes. Several new instruments, planning and management approaches
have been tested, professionals have been trained, and the regulatory framework has
been partly adjusted.",
publisher = "Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office Serbia",
title = "Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management"
}

Müller, H., Wehrmann, B., Čolić, R., Fürst, A., Begović, B., Jochheim-Wirtz, C., Božić, B., Ferenčak, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2015). Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management. 
Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade..

Müller H, Wehrmann B, Čolić R, Fürst A, Begović B, Jochheim-Wirtz C, Božić B, Ferenčak M, Zeković S. Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management. 2015;..

Müller, Harald, Wehrmann, Babette, Čolić, Ratka, Fürst, Ariana, Begović, Branko, Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph, Božić, Branko, Ferenčak, Miodrag, Zeković, Slavka, "Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management" (2015).