TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Nedović-Budić, Zorica
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Russel, Paula
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/749
AB  - The evaluation of planning policies and practices has mostly been lagging behind planning activity. The evaluation of participation seems even more perplexed if taken that it has to inevitably deal with the question of values, processes and outcomes, but also the fact that such practices do not exist in a vacuum and are exposed to various internal and external dynamics. An evaluation study of public participation was carried out in seven (7) Serbian cities. The methodological approach is grounded in an interpretive analysis of policy and practice, where planners were interviewed over the course of two years after introducing an additional level of participation in planning legislation. The results imply that procedural participation represents no guarantee of actual changes in outcomes of planning, and that practical experimentation beyond minimal legal obligations may do more for achieving visible and less visible results in the field of deliberation and governance.
PB  - Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland
C3  - Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV
T1  - Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities
SP  - 169
EP  - 169
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_749
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Nedović-Budić, Zorica and Čolić, Ratka and Russel, Paula",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The evaluation of planning policies and practices has mostly been lagging behind planning activity. The evaluation of participation seems even more perplexed if taken that it has to inevitably deal with the question of values, processes and outcomes, but also the fact that such practices do not exist in a vacuum and are exposed to various internal and external dynamics. An evaluation study of public participation was carried out in seven (7) Serbian cities. The methodological approach is grounded in an interpretive analysis of policy and practice, where planners were interviewed over the course of two years after introducing an additional level of participation in planning legislation. The results imply that procedural participation represents no guarantee of actual changes in outcomes of planning, and that practical experimentation beyond minimal legal obligations may do more for achieving visible and less visible results in the field of deliberation and governance.",
publisher = "Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland",
journal = "Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV",
title = "Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities",
pages = "169-169",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_749"
}

Čolić, N., Nedović-Budić, Z., Čolić, R.,& Russel, P.. (2019). Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities. in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV
Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland., 169-169.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_749

Čolić N, Nedović-Budić Z, Čolić R, Russel P. Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities. in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV. 2019;:169-169.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_749 .

Čolić, Nataša, Nedović-Budić, Zorica, Čolić, Ratka, Russel, Paula, "Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities" in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV (2019):169-169,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_749 .