TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Dželebdžić, Omiljena
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/752
AB  - This article considers a decade of practice and research in the field of
participatory planning in the context of a post-socialist country, Serbia. The main aim is to assess the transformative potential of participation within the following domains: 1) formation of relationships, 2) recognition of issues and priorities, 3) perception of values and results of planning process, and 4) possibility for
institutionalization of participatory practice in a post-socialist country planning context. The presented work examines urban development practices in 45 Serbian cities through the lenses of 95 professional planners that were interviewed over the course of 13 years. What is common to all of the examined cases is that participatory planning processes were realized through the support of international programs that operated in the field of territorial governance in Serbia from 2007 to 2020. Findings indicate that the acceptance of new concepts and policies in the local path-contingent practice requires pragmatic attitude of planning professionals, small steps and liberty to experiment, but also a possibility to discuss new discourses and understand their results. In the theoretical frame, this article contributes to the critical analysis of pragmatism and the flow of
transnational policy discourse.
PB  - Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)
PB  - Gdańsk : University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture
C3  - Book of abstracts: Adaptive Planning - Rethinking Planning Practices
T1  - Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia
SP  - 159
EP  - 160
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Ratka and Čolić, Nataša and Dželebdžić, Omiljena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This article considers a decade of practice and research in the field of
participatory planning in the context of a post-socialist country, Serbia. The main aim is to assess the transformative potential of participation within the following domains: 1) formation of relationships, 2) recognition of issues and priorities, 3) perception of values and results of planning process, and 4) possibility for
institutionalization of participatory practice in a post-socialist country planning context. The presented work examines urban development practices in 45 Serbian cities through the lenses of 95 professional planners that were interviewed over the course of 13 years. What is common to all of the examined cases is that participatory planning processes were realized through the support of international programs that operated in the field of territorial governance in Serbia from 2007 to 2020. Findings indicate that the acceptance of new concepts and policies in the local path-contingent practice requires pragmatic attitude of planning professionals, small steps and liberty to experiment, but also a possibility to discuss new discourses and understand their results. In the theoretical frame, this article contributes to the critical analysis of pragmatism and the flow of
transnational policy discourse.",
publisher = "Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP), Gdańsk : University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture",
journal = "Book of abstracts: Adaptive Planning - Rethinking Planning Practices",
title = "Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia",
pages = "159-160"
}

Čolić, R., Čolić, N.,& Dželebdžić, O.. (2021). Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia. in Book of abstracts: Adaptive Planning - Rethinking Planning Practices
Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)., 159-160.

Čolić R, Čolić N, Dželebdžić O. Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia. in Book of abstracts: Adaptive Planning - Rethinking Planning Practices. 2021;:159-160..

Čolić, Ratka, Čolić, Nataša, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, "Transformative potential of participatory planning in a post-socialist context of Serbia" in Book of abstracts: Adaptive Planning - Rethinking Planning Practices (2021):159-160.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Dželebdžić, Omiljena
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
PY  - 2021-10-21
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/756
AB  - The aim of this research is to examine the new directions of democratic practices in urban governance, including public participation and multi-stakeholder involvement in Serbia. Through the reflections of Serbian planning practitioners and planners, the paper frames their historical reality of transitional, post-socialist local context as ‘somewhere in-between’ a complex system of dynamics. Therefore, the requirements of market economy, EU policies, new planning ideas and influences together with the formal participatory procedures and professional idea of the previous, socialist practice come together to this contemporary historical reality. The paper explores, through ethnographic research with 
professional planners (from 2007 to 2020), the application of participatory methods with the support of international programs that operated in the field of urban governance in Serbia. The research framework combines critical pragmatism and collaborative planning to shed light on daily planning practice characterized by an ongoing transition through dynamics that has shifted to governance, pluralism, and markets. These dynamics have been even more evident when the urban planning challenge during COVID-19 pandemic, have provided practitioners’ insights into ‘what can, and should we do now?’. The paper defines planning actions take form of small, pragmatic steps and alternative practices that hope to contribute to effective urban governance on specific urban challenges.
PB  - Aalborg : Aalborg Universitet
C3  - Book of abstracts: Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-pandemic World
T1  - Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia
SP  - 2
EP  - 2
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Dželebdžić, Omiljena and Čolić, Ratka",
year = "2021-10-21",
abstract = "The aim of this research is to examine the new directions of democratic practices in urban governance, including public participation and multi-stakeholder involvement in Serbia. Through the reflections of Serbian planning practitioners and planners, the paper frames their historical reality of transitional, post-socialist local context as ‘somewhere in-between’ a complex system of dynamics. Therefore, the requirements of market economy, EU policies, new planning ideas and influences together with the formal participatory procedures and professional idea of the previous, socialist practice come together to this contemporary historical reality. The paper explores, through ethnographic research with 
professional planners (from 2007 to 2020), the application of participatory methods with the support of international programs that operated in the field of urban governance in Serbia. The research framework combines critical pragmatism and collaborative planning to shed light on daily planning practice characterized by an ongoing transition through dynamics that has shifted to governance, pluralism, and markets. These dynamics have been even more evident when the urban planning challenge during COVID-19 pandemic, have provided practitioners’ insights into ‘what can, and should we do now?’. The paper defines planning actions take form of small, pragmatic steps and alternative practices that hope to contribute to effective urban governance on specific urban challenges.",
publisher = "Aalborg : Aalborg Universitet",
journal = "Book of abstracts: Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-pandemic World",
title = "Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia",
pages = "2-2"
}

Čolić, N., Dželebdžić, O.,& Čolić, R.. (2021-10-21). Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia. in Book of abstracts: Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-pandemic World
Aalborg : Aalborg Universitet., 2-2.

Čolić N, Dželebdžić O, Čolić R. Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia. in Book of abstracts: Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-pandemic World. 2021;:2-2..

Čolić, Nataša, Dželebdžić, Omiljena, Čolić, Ratka, "Rethinking participatory practices of professional planners as a response to urban governance in Serbia" in Book of abstracts: Transforming Urban Governance in a Post-pandemic World (2021-10-21):2-2.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Milić, Đorđe
AU  - Petrić, Jasna
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/625
AB  - In 2019, Serbia adopted its first national urban policy. This document was established through a communicative process during 2018–2019, formally encouraging urban governance as a practical innovation in Serbia’s planning doctrine. The main aim of this research is to explore institutional capacity development within a live setting of the policy formation process. The participants of this process are the primary subjects of the research. Data was collected through participatory events in four instances during the process. The concept of institutional capacity development is used in this paper as a basic framework to assess knowledge, relational and mobilisation capacity for urban governance. The main contribution of this paper is providing an understanding of the challenges and potentials for establishing urban governance practices in a post-socialist country planning context. Findings indicate an increase in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of governance instruments such that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The identified challenges relate to the mobilisation capacity and fragility of institutions and resistance to change, while a need to deal with complexity and uncertainty remains present.
T2  - Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
T1  - Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views
DO  - 10.1177/23996544211002188
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Čolić, Ratka and Milić, Đorđe and Petrić, Jasna and Čolić, Nataša",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In 2019, Serbia adopted its first national urban policy. This document was established through a communicative process during 2018–2019, formally encouraging urban governance as a practical innovation in Serbia’s planning doctrine. The main aim of this research is to explore institutional capacity development within a live setting of the policy formation process. The participants of this process are the primary subjects of the research. Data was collected through participatory events in four instances during the process. The concept of institutional capacity development is used in this paper as a basic framework to assess knowledge, relational and mobilisation capacity for urban governance. The main contribution of this paper is providing an understanding of the challenges and potentials for establishing urban governance practices in a post-socialist country planning context. Findings indicate an increase in the participants’ knowledge and understanding of governance instruments such that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The identified challenges relate to the mobilisation capacity and fragility of institutions and resistance to change, while a need to deal with complexity and uncertainty remains present.",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space",
title = "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views",
doi = "10.1177/23996544211002188"
}

Čolić, R., Milić, Đ., Petrić, J.,& Čolić, N.. (2021). Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views. in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188

Čolić R, Milić Đ, Petrić J, Čolić N. Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views. in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. 2021;.
doi:10.1177/23996544211002188 .

Čolić, Ratka, Milić, Đorđe, Petrić, Jasna, Čolić, Nataša, "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views" in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211002188 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Nedović-Budić, Zorica
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Russel, Paula
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/749
AB  - The evaluation of planning policies and practices has mostly been lagging behind planning activity. The evaluation of participation seems even more perplexed if taken that it has to inevitably deal with the question of values, processes and outcomes, but also the fact that such practices do not exist in a vacuum and are exposed to various internal and external dynamics. An evaluation study of public participation was carried out in seven (7) Serbian cities. The methodological approach is grounded in an interpretive analysis of policy and practice, where planners were interviewed over the course of two years after introducing an additional level of participation in planning legislation. The results imply that procedural participation represents no guarantee of actual changes in outcomes of planning, and that practical experimentation beyond minimal legal obligations may do more for achieving visible and less visible results in the field of deliberation and governance.
PB  - Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland
C3  - Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV
T1  - Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities
SP  - 169
EP  - 169
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Nedović-Budić, Zorica and Čolić, Ratka and Russel, Paula",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The evaluation of planning policies and practices has mostly been lagging behind planning activity. The evaluation of participation seems even more perplexed if taken that it has to inevitably deal with the question of values, processes and outcomes, but also the fact that such practices do not exist in a vacuum and are exposed to various internal and external dynamics. An evaluation study of public participation was carried out in seven (7) Serbian cities. The methodological approach is grounded in an interpretive analysis of policy and practice, where planners were interviewed over the course of two years after introducing an additional level of participation in planning legislation. The results imply that procedural participation represents no guarantee of actual changes in outcomes of planning, and that practical experimentation beyond minimal legal obligations may do more for achieving visible and less visible results in the field of deliberation and governance.",
publisher = "Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland",
journal = "Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV",
title = "Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities",
pages = "169-169"
}

Čolić, N., Nedović-Budić, Z., Čolić, R.,& Russel, P.. (2019). Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities. in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV
Dublin : University College Dublin, Ireland., 169-169.

Čolić N, Nedović-Budić Z, Čolić R, Russel P. Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities. in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV. 2019;:169-169..

Čolić, Nataša, Nedović-Budić, Zorica, Čolić, Ratka, Russel, Paula, "Qualitative perception on participatory planning policy and practice: evidence from seven Serbian cities" in Book of abstracts: EURA – UAA Conference, City Futures IV (2019):169-169.

TY  - CONF
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Petrić, Jasna
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/750
AB  - The paper focuses on the assessment of participatory process in formulation of national urban development policy of Serbia until 2030. The assessment of participation is attached to the complexities in defining auxiliary set of evaluation criteria, while the process itself requires activities focused on individuals, organizations and their institutional environment, and the linkages between
the different governance levels and instruments. The assessment in this paper is based on a mixed method approach. Quantification is used to measure the level of satisfaction/dissatisfaction of actors involved in the process, while the qualitative analysis provides an in-depth understanding on the visible and less visible results of their engagement. Findings point out the increase in participants’ knowledge and understanding of the planning process, and the possibility of
institutionalising such a process in a way that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The most important elements of active stakeholder involvement were recognised in the possibility to attain the public discourse which enabled: 1) prioritization of the national urban development programs, 2) linking planning with financing, and 3) better understanding of the relation between traditional spatial/urban planning and new governance instruments. The identified
challenges relate to the need for further support to the implementation of the strategy through legislation, institutions, capacities and funding. The fragility of institutions and resistance to change in the transitional context of the post-socialist country is present. At the same time there is a need to deal with complexity and uncertanity, where the findings point out at the necessity to rely on the openness and vitality of the local level and experts involved in the process.
PB  - Venice : Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)
C3  - AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Abstracts
T1  - Participatory Planning at the National Level - the Case of Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development Strategy of Serbia
SP  - 278
EP  - 278
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Čolić, Ratka and Petrić, Jasna and Čolić, Nataša",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The paper focuses on the assessment of participatory process in formulation of national urban development policy of Serbia until 2030. The assessment of participation is attached to the complexities in defining auxiliary set of evaluation criteria, while the process itself requires activities focused on individuals, organizations and their institutional environment, and the linkages between
the different governance levels and instruments. The assessment in this paper is based on a mixed method approach. Quantification is used to measure the level of satisfaction/dissatisfaction of actors involved in the process, while the qualitative analysis provides an in-depth understanding on the visible and less visible results of their engagement. Findings point out the increase in participants’ knowledge and understanding of the planning process, and the possibility of
institutionalising such a process in a way that coordination and cooperation are continually unfolding. The most important elements of active stakeholder involvement were recognised in the possibility to attain the public discourse which enabled: 1) prioritization of the national urban development programs, 2) linking planning with financing, and 3) better understanding of the relation between traditional spatial/urban planning and new governance instruments. The identified
challenges relate to the need for further support to the implementation of the strategy through legislation, institutions, capacities and funding. The fragility of institutions and resistance to change in the transitional context of the post-socialist country is present. At the same time there is a need to deal with complexity and uncertanity, where the findings point out at the necessity to rely on the openness and vitality of the local level and experts involved in the process.",
publisher = "Venice : Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)",
journal = "AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Abstracts",
title = "Participatory Planning at the National Level - the Case of Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development Strategy of Serbia",
pages = "278-278"
}

Čolić, R., Petrić, J.,& Čolić, N.. (2019). Participatory Planning at the National Level - the Case of Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development Strategy of Serbia. in AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Abstracts
Venice : Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)., 278-278.

Čolić R, Petrić J, Čolić N. Participatory Planning at the National Level - the Case of Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development Strategy of Serbia. in AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Abstracts. 2019;:278-278..

Čolić, Ratka, Petrić, Jasna, Čolić, Nataša, "Participatory Planning at the National Level - the Case of Sustainable and Integrated Urban Development Strategy of Serbia" in AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Abstracts (2019):278-278.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Čolić, Nataša
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/327
AB  - Open public spaceis usully seen as physical, but also dialogic space that promotes social responsibility and affectsthe quality of life of citizens. Public participation in planning and design of such spaces has been observed as a fundamental emanation of democracy. This paper considers the effects of applying participatory approach to the urban design of open public spaces as a practical experimentin teaching. Different levels and methods of participation were used in order to
identify main problems and potentials for the use of public space, formulate goals and priorities, and re-evaluate the concepts of urban design. Acquiring knowledge is considered to be the most important result of a dynamic approach, directed towardslearning and achieving new skills. Thus,
this paper suggests that the capacity development through participationmay be seen as a basis for the future community development, and longitudinal care forthe public space as common good.
AB  - Otvoreni javni prostori se uglavnom posmatraju kao fizički, ali i kao dijaloški, prostori koji podstiču društvenu odgovornost i utiču na kvalitet života u datom lokalnom kontekstu. Učešće javnosti u planiranju i dizajnu takvih prostora se već duži niz godina posmatra kao osnovna emanacija demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra efekte primene participativnog pristupa urbanom dizajnu otvorenih javnih prostora kao praktičnog eksperimenta u nastavi. U procesu urbanog dizajna su korišćeni različiti nivoi i metode participacije kako bi se prepoznali glavni problemi i potencijali u korišćenju javnih prostora, formulisali ciljevi i prioritetne aktivnosti za njihovo uređenje, kao i reevaluirali početni koncepti. U ovom radu se saznanje sagledava kao najznačajni rezultat dinamičkog pristupa, usmeravanja na razvoj novih znanja i sposobnosti. S tim u vezi, sugeriše se da se razvijanje kapaciteta kroz participaciju može posmatrati i kao osnova za budući razvoj zajednice i brigu o javnom prostoru kao zajedničkom dobru.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
T2  - Arhitektura i urbanizam
T1  - Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design
T1  - Dijaloški i javni prostor - participativni pristup urbanom dizajnu
VL  - 47
SP  - 37
EP  - 45
DO  - 10.5937/a-u0-17445
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Čolić, Nataša and Čolić, Ratka",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Open public spaceis usully seen as physical, but also dialogic space that promotes social responsibility and affectsthe quality of life of citizens. Public participation in planning and design of such spaces has been observed as a fundamental emanation of democracy. This paper considers the effects of applying participatory approach to the urban design of open public spaces as a practical experimentin teaching. Different levels and methods of participation were used in order to
identify main problems and potentials for the use of public space, formulate goals and priorities, and re-evaluate the concepts of urban design. Acquiring knowledge is considered to be the most important result of a dynamic approach, directed towardslearning and achieving new skills. Thus,
this paper suggests that the capacity development through participationmay be seen as a basis for the future community development, and longitudinal care forthe public space as common good., Otvoreni javni prostori se uglavnom posmatraju kao fizički, ali i kao dijaloški, prostori koji podstiču društvenu odgovornost i utiču na kvalitet života u datom lokalnom kontekstu. Učešće javnosti u planiranju i dizajnu takvih prostora se već duži niz godina posmatra kao osnovna emanacija demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra efekte primene participativnog pristupa urbanom dizajnu otvorenih javnih prostora kao praktičnog eksperimenta u nastavi. U procesu urbanog dizajna su korišćeni različiti nivoi i metode participacije kako bi se prepoznali glavni problemi i potencijali u korišćenju javnih prostora, formulisali ciljevi i prioritetne aktivnosti za njihovo uređenje, kao i reevaluirali početni koncepti. U ovom radu se saznanje sagledava kao najznačajni rezultat dinamičkog pristupa, usmeravanja na razvoj novih znanja i sposobnosti. S tim u vezi, sugeriše se da se razvijanje kapaciteta kroz participaciju može posmatrati i kao osnova za budući razvoj zajednice i brigu o javnom prostoru kao zajedničkom dobru.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije",
journal = "Arhitektura i urbanizam",
title = "Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design, Dijaloški i javni prostor - participativni pristup urbanom dizajnu",
volume = "47",
pages = "37-45",
doi = "10.5937/a-u0-17445"
}

Čolić, N.,& Čolić, R.. (2018). Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design. in Arhitektura i urbanizam
Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije., 47, 37-45.
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-17445

Čolić N, Čolić R. Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design. in Arhitektura i urbanizam. 2018;47:37-45.
doi:10.5937/a-u0-17445 .

Čolić, Nataša, Čolić, Ratka, "Dialogic and public space: Participatory approach to urban design" in Arhitektura i urbanizam, 47 (2018):37-45,
https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-17445 . .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Müller, Harald
AU  - Wehrmann, Babette
AU  - Čolić, Ratka
AU  - Fürst, Ariana
AU  - Begović, Branko
AU  - Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph
AU  - Božić, Branko
AU  - Ferenčak, Miodrag
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://www.urbanlandmanagement.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Six-Years-of-Strengthening-of-Local-Land-Management-Urban-Module_ENG.pdf
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/386
AB  - After 6 years of Serbian-German cooperation in the field of urban land management, some
steps towards sustainable urban land management in Serbia have been taken. Existing
instruments have been adapted and new ones introduced with the objective to improve
the ecological, economic and social sustainability of urban land management processes
and their outcomes. Several new instruments, planning and management approaches
have been tested, professionals have been trained, and the regulatory framework has
been partly adjusted.
PB  - Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade
PB  - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office Serbia
T1  - Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Müller, Harald and Wehrmann, Babette and Čolić, Ratka and Fürst, Ariana and Begović, Branko and Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph and Božić, Branko and Ferenčak, Miodrag and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2015",
abstract = "After 6 years of Serbian-German cooperation in the field of urban land management, some
steps towards sustainable urban land management in Serbia have been taken. Existing
instruments have been adapted and new ones introduced with the objective to improve
the ecological, economic and social sustainability of urban land management processes
and their outcomes. Several new instruments, planning and management approaches
have been tested, professionals have been trained, and the regulatory framework has
been partly adjusted.",
publisher = "Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office Serbia",
title = "Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management"
}

Müller, H., Wehrmann, B., Čolić, R., Fürst, A., Begović, B., Jochheim-Wirtz, C., Božić, B., Ferenčak, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2015). Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management. 
Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting Representative Office Belgrade..

Müller H, Wehrmann B, Čolić R, Fürst A, Begović B, Jochheim-Wirtz C, Božić B, Ferenčak M, Zeković S. Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management. 2015;..

Müller, Harald, Wehrmann, Babette, Čolić, Ratka, Fürst, Ariana, Begović, Branko, Jochheim-Wirtz, Christoph, Božić, Branko, Ferenčak, Miodrag, Zeković, Slavka, "Strengthening of local land management in Serbia: results of 6 years of German-Serbian cooperation : module 1: urban land management" (2015).