Zeković, Slavka

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0003-3755-6064
  • Zeković, Slavka (107)
  • Зековић, Славка (14)
Projects
The role and implementation of the national spatial plan and regional development documents in renewal of strategic research, thinking and governance in Serbia Sustainable spatial development of Danube area in Serbia
Transitioning towards Urban Resilience and Sustainability Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 451-03-68/2020-14/200006 (Institute of Architecture and Regional and Urban Planning of Serbia, Belgrade)
Teorijski i metodološki osnov za novu generaciju dokumenata održivog razvoja u SCG: usklađivanje sa novim evropskim i regionalnim dokumentima Prostorni, socijalni i ekološki aspekti razvoja u velikim rudarskim basenima
Prostorno planiranje u funkciji ravnomernijeg regionalnog razvoja, očuvanja životne sredine i razvoja turizma“, Podprojekat 3 „Zaštita sredine u planiranju i uređenju prostora“, 1994-1997 Pristup i koncept za izradu Strategije prostornog razvoja Srbije
Support to Process of Urban Development in Serbia (SPUDS) (SCOPES programme, no. 160503) (1995-1999) "Racionalno korišćenje resursa i potencijala prostora - polazišta za strategiju održivog razvoja Srbije" (ev.br. 09T10PT2)
„Planiranje i upravljanje razvojem u uslovima prelaska na tržišnu privredu-institucionalno prilagođavanje praksi i standardima EU”, ev. br. 1383 09Т11 „Oбнoвa и рeкoнструкциja грaдoвa Србије“, 1996-2000
1383 "‘Планирање и управљање развојeм у услoвимa прeлaскa нa тржишну приврeду-институциoнaлнo прилaгoђaвaњe прaкси и стaндaрдимa EУ‘, EF, IAUS, 2002-2005. (1995-1997) "Prostorno planiranje u funkciji ravnomernijeg regionalnog razvoja, očuvanja životne sredine i razvoja turizma" (ev.br. S.5.01.57.161)
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH „Strengthening of Local Land Management in Serbia“ Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 451-03-68/2020-14/200090 (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture)
Spatial, environmental, energy and social aspects of developing settlements and climate change - mutual impacts Razvoj i ispitivanje ravnog prijemnika sunčeve energije za toplotno pretvaranje“ EE.707-1017.B
Научно-истраживачки пројекат 09Т11 „Обнова и реконструкција градова Србије“, 1996-2000, Подпројекат 1 – „Земљишна политика у функцији обнове и реконструкције“, МНТР Републике Србије Просторно и урбанистичко планирање
С.Г.Р.4.12.0225A „Развој, просторно уређење и кoришћeњe мaгистрaлних инфрaструктурних коридора у Србиjи“, 2002.-2004.

Author's Bibliography

Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?

Zeković, Slavka; Perić, Ana

(Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Perić, Ana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/743
AB  - This paper analyzes post-socialist industrial development and policy in the Western Balkans through the lens of its regional specialization and spatial concentration. Against a conceptual framework revolving around place-based industrial policy, and using the Concentration index (modified Herfindahl-Hirschman index) and location coefficients (Balassa index), a comparative analysis over three decades (1990–2020) highlights weak regional diversification and intra-regional integration of industrial activity. The findings offer a new industrial policy that transcends regional specialization and spatial concentration to address regional development, planning and governance. The concluding remarks reveal some basic paths toward effective and pro-European regional industrial policy in the Western Balkans.
PB  - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
T2  - Eastern European Economics
T1  - Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?
DO  - 10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Perić, Ana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "This paper analyzes post-socialist industrial development and policy in the Western Balkans through the lens of its regional specialization and spatial concentration. Against a conceptual framework revolving around place-based industrial policy, and using the Concentration index (modified Herfindahl-Hirschman index) and location coefficients (Balassa index), a comparative analysis over three decades (1990–2020) highlights weak regional diversification and intra-regional integration of industrial activity. The findings offer a new industrial policy that transcends regional specialization and spatial concentration to address regional development, planning and governance. The concluding remarks reveal some basic paths toward effective and pro-European regional industrial policy in the Western Balkans.",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group",
journal = "Eastern European Economics",
title = "Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?",
doi = "10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936"
}
Zeković, S.,& Perić, A.. (2023). Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?. in Eastern European Economics
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group..
https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936
Zeković S, Perić A. Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?. in Eastern European Economics. 2023;.
doi:10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936 .
Zeković, Slavka, Perić, Ana, "Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?" in Eastern European Economics (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2178936 . .

Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?

Zeković, Slavka

(Association of European Schools of Planning/AESOP, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://proceedings.aesop-planning.eu/index.php/aesopro/issue/view/13
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/813
AB  - The paper analyzes the expansion of neoliberal financialization in urban (re)development in the post-socialist context of Serbia. After the year 2000, the transitional changes and the establishing of the post-socialist institutional framework have created conditions for attracting foreign direct investments, predominantly in the services sector and urban real estate. Due to the global financial crisis and the collapse of the real estate bubble (2008), this sector is rapidly recovering and developing, thanks to the state support. The introduction of new regulations in financial activities with a role to neutralize the speculative tendencies at the market was largely absent, which is especially reflected in the urban (re)development. The galloping urban financialization has been fueled by growing interests of capital in the real estate sector. The financialization would have been almost impossible without the arrival of the world's leading real estate investment trusts and the investment of international capital in housing, commerce space, offices, and urban land. The urban financialization, especially housing financialization, is a dominant and the fastest growing activity that uses new financial instruments and products. It is considered driving force of financial capitalism in urban redevelopment through extraction and monetization of the values of urban commons. The paper explores the financialization of urban real estate under the patronage of post-socialist state. We apply a comprehensive empirical analysis of financialization from a multi-scalar perspective: using available indicators (at the national scale); and using a panoramic view on several large urban projects in Belgrade (at the local level). Our findings indicate that financialization was accompanied by a strong appropriation and erosion of urban commons and norms, as well as a new assetization game. Given the lack of research on financialization in Serbia, we propose some improvements regarding the control of the urban financialization, planning and governance in line to the UN Guidelines, as well as the global financing approach in the new economy.
PB  - Association of European Schools of Planning/AESOP
PB  - Reading, UK : University of Reading
PB  - Tartu, Estonia : Estonian University of Life Sciences
PB  - Tallinn, Estonia : Tallinn University
C3  - Book of Abstracts, AESOP Annual Congress "Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice", Track 13: Politics, 25-29 July, Tartu, Estonia
T1  - Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?
VL  - 34
IS  - 1
SP  - 874
EP  - 875
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_813
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the expansion of neoliberal financialization in urban (re)development in the post-socialist context of Serbia. After the year 2000, the transitional changes and the establishing of the post-socialist institutional framework have created conditions for attracting foreign direct investments, predominantly in the services sector and urban real estate. Due to the global financial crisis and the collapse of the real estate bubble (2008), this sector is rapidly recovering and developing, thanks to the state support. The introduction of new regulations in financial activities with a role to neutralize the speculative tendencies at the market was largely absent, which is especially reflected in the urban (re)development. The galloping urban financialization has been fueled by growing interests of capital in the real estate sector. The financialization would have been almost impossible without the arrival of the world's leading real estate investment trusts and the investment of international capital in housing, commerce space, offices, and urban land. The urban financialization, especially housing financialization, is a dominant and the fastest growing activity that uses new financial instruments and products. It is considered driving force of financial capitalism in urban redevelopment through extraction and monetization of the values of urban commons. The paper explores the financialization of urban real estate under the patronage of post-socialist state. We apply a comprehensive empirical analysis of financialization from a multi-scalar perspective: using available indicators (at the national scale); and using a panoramic view on several large urban projects in Belgrade (at the local level). Our findings indicate that financialization was accompanied by a strong appropriation and erosion of urban commons and norms, as well as a new assetization game. Given the lack of research on financialization in Serbia, we propose some improvements regarding the control of the urban financialization, planning and governance in line to the UN Guidelines, as well as the global financing approach in the new economy.",
publisher = "Association of European Schools of Planning/AESOP, Reading, UK : University of Reading, Tartu, Estonia : Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia : Tallinn University",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, AESOP Annual Congress "Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice", Track 13: Politics, 25-29 July, Tartu, Estonia",
title = "Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?",
volume = "34",
number = "1",
pages = "874-875",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_813"
}
Zeković, S.. (2022). Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?. in Book of Abstracts, AESOP Annual Congress "Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice", Track 13: Politics, 25-29 July, Tartu, Estonia
Association of European Schools of Planning/AESOP., 34(1), 874-875.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_813
Zeković S. Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?. in Book of Abstracts, AESOP Annual Congress "Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice", Track 13: Politics, 25-29 July, Tartu, Estonia. 2022;34(1):874-875.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_813 .
Zeković, Slavka, "Post-socialist urban financialization: Flexibilization of urban norms and commons, or just a new assetization game?" in Book of Abstracts, AESOP Annual Congress "Space for Species: Redefining Spatial Justice", Track 13: Politics, 25-29 July, Tartu, Estonia, 34, no. 1 (2022):874-875,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_813 .

Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront

Zeković, Slavka; Maričić, Tamara

(Taylor & Francis Online, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/810
AB  - The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Territory, Politics, Governance
T1  - Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
SP  - 527
EP  - 548
DO  - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online, Routledge",
journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance",
title = "Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront",
volume = "10",
number = "4",
pages = "527-548",
doi = "10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410"
}
Zeković, S.,& Maričić, T.. (2022). Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance
Taylor & Francis Online., 10(4), 527-548.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zeković S, Maričić T. Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance. 2022;10(4):527-548.
doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 .
Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, "Contemporary Governance of Urban Mega-projects: Case Study of Belgrade Waterfront" in Territory, Politics, Governance, 10, no. 4 (2022):527-548,
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 . .
5

Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?

Zeković, Slavka

(Volos, Greece : University of Thessaly, Department of Planning and Regional Development, Laboratory of Urban Morphology & Design, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/815
AB  - The paper explores urban financialization through urban megaprojects (UMPs), as instruments of urban development, and specific types of urban exceptionalities on the example of the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). The post-socialist institutional framework has provided the conditions for attracting foreign investments, especially those of interest to the leading real estate investment trusts and international capital in the services and urban real estate sectors. Real estate financialization is a general pattern of neoliberalized urban transformations, mostly through UMPs. Neoliberal principles of urban planning are widely accepted, while state structures at the top of the government broadly accept the concept of “exceptions” in urban financialization, i.e. the “exceptionality” of BWP as a “new trademark of our capital city and Europe’. The process of financialization through UMPs in the post-socialist urban development is fast-growing. This is made possible by using new financial instruments and products, and by extracting and monetizing the values of urban commons in the procedure of decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG).   The various aspects of UMPs make them exceptional and extremely complex: huge size, sometimes unpredictable outcomes and diverse multi-scale impacts. Their exceptional character causes changes to the urban rules, conditions, planning regime, urban matrix, and introduces “exceptions” in the process of DMPG. These changes encompass the suspension and violation of urban norms; the acceptance of exceptional standards; flexibilization of norms, and finally, their normalization on multi-scales. We explore the exceptionality of the DMPG of BWP under state patronage and international investors. Starting from the premises of Agamben's theory and the game theory, we applied a comprehensive analysis of DMPG onto BWP. The findings point to a strong appropriation and erosion of urban commons, to violations of various rights and norms (including the urban norms), as the consequences of a new assetization game driven by the predicted outcomes of urban financialization and the concept of the “state of exceptions”. Under the influence of the applied framework of the “state of exceptions” new “exceptional spaces” in urban environment are being created, such as closed smart ghettos of the rich, and ghettos of the poor. The paper indicates exceptional socio-spatial phenomena, such as: mainly state-led gentrification; the new urban ghettos; and the endangering of public interests, goods, properties, as well as public finance. It was concluded that it is necessary to rethink the acceptability of UMPs “exceptionality”, the violation and servility of current urban norms, but also the flexibilization and normalization in DMPG towards more inclusive and sustainable perspectives. Additionally, a shift from the existing practices in DMPG of UMPs is suggested, such as: the reconsideration of lex specialis (for BWP); avoidance of exclusive fast-lane and “top-top” approaches to UMPs; exclusion of a fortiori approach in DMPG; limitation of the discretionary powers of the central government; elimination of planning decisionism through by-laws (especially in urban land-use, alienation of public construction land without fees); extra-territorial urban planning of the UMPs; poor participation, etc. Some recommendations for improving the DMPG for UMPs and for controlling these “exceptions” in the post-socialist context will be given.
PB  - Volos, Greece : University of Thessaly, Department of Planning and Regional Development, Laboratory of Urban Morphology & Design
C3  - Book of Proceedings,  Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions
T1  - Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?
SP  - 1347
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_815
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The paper explores urban financialization through urban megaprojects (UMPs), as instruments of urban development, and specific types of urban exceptionalities on the example of the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). The post-socialist institutional framework has provided the conditions for attracting foreign investments, especially those of interest to the leading real estate investment trusts and international capital in the services and urban real estate sectors. Real estate financialization is a general pattern of neoliberalized urban transformations, mostly through UMPs. Neoliberal principles of urban planning are widely accepted, while state structures at the top of the government broadly accept the concept of “exceptions” in urban financialization, i.e. the “exceptionality” of BWP as a “new trademark of our capital city and Europe’. The process of financialization through UMPs in the post-socialist urban development is fast-growing. This is made possible by using new financial instruments and products, and by extracting and monetizing the values of urban commons in the procedure of decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG).   The various aspects of UMPs make them exceptional and extremely complex: huge size, sometimes unpredictable outcomes and diverse multi-scale impacts. Their exceptional character causes changes to the urban rules, conditions, planning regime, urban matrix, and introduces “exceptions” in the process of DMPG. These changes encompass the suspension and violation of urban norms; the acceptance of exceptional standards; flexibilization of norms, and finally, their normalization on multi-scales. We explore the exceptionality of the DMPG of BWP under state patronage and international investors. Starting from the premises of Agamben's theory and the game theory, we applied a comprehensive analysis of DMPG onto BWP. The findings point to a strong appropriation and erosion of urban commons, to violations of various rights and norms (including the urban norms), as the consequences of a new assetization game driven by the predicted outcomes of urban financialization and the concept of the “state of exceptions”. Under the influence of the applied framework of the “state of exceptions” new “exceptional spaces” in urban environment are being created, such as closed smart ghettos of the rich, and ghettos of the poor. The paper indicates exceptional socio-spatial phenomena, such as: mainly state-led gentrification; the new urban ghettos; and the endangering of public interests, goods, properties, as well as public finance. It was concluded that it is necessary to rethink the acceptability of UMPs “exceptionality”, the violation and servility of current urban norms, but also the flexibilization and normalization in DMPG towards more inclusive and sustainable perspectives. Additionally, a shift from the existing practices in DMPG of UMPs is suggested, such as: the reconsideration of lex specialis (for BWP); avoidance of exclusive fast-lane and “top-top” approaches to UMPs; exclusion of a fortiori approach in DMPG; limitation of the discretionary powers of the central government; elimination of planning decisionism through by-laws (especially in urban land-use, alienation of public construction land without fees); extra-territorial urban planning of the UMPs; poor participation, etc. Some recommendations for improving the DMPG for UMPs and for controlling these “exceptions” in the post-socialist context will be given.",
publisher = "Volos, Greece : University of Thessaly, Department of Planning and Regional Development, Laboratory of Urban Morphology & Design",
journal = "Book of Proceedings,  Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions",
title = "Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?",
pages = "1347",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_815"
}
Zeković, S.. (2022). Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?. in Book of Proceedings,  Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions
Volos, Greece : University of Thessaly, Department of Planning and Regional Development, Laboratory of Urban Morphology & Design., 1347.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_815
Zeković S. Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?. in Book of Proceedings,  Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions. 2022;:1347.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_815 .
Zeković, Slavka, "Post-socialist financialization through urban mega-projects: Flexibilization of norms and commons, or just an exceptional a fortiori game?" in Book of Proceedings,  Proceedings of the International Conference on Changing Cities V: Spatial, Design, Landscape, Heritage & Socio-economic Dimensions (2022):1347,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_815 .

Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia

Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art - IRASA, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/814
AB  - The paper explores the growing financialization in Serbia in the post-crisis period from 2008 to 2021. The research includes an overview of the theoretical background of  financialization based on the neoclassical and heterodox understandings of this process. The empirical analysis of the financialization of residential and non-residential properties at national level will be used. From the aspect of financialization, it would provide insight into the relationship between the financial system, macroeconomic developments and urban (re)development in the post-socialist practice. Moreover, a comparative ex-post analysis of the process of financialization in Serbia and the selected post-socialist countries of CEE and SEE based on the quantitative research will be presented. The empirical exploration shall be conducted within two domains: firstly, through the identification of different dimensions of financialization, such as  the transition from a bank-based to a  market-based financial system, the inflows of foreign financial investment (including FDI), the financialization of non-financial corporations and the population, and urban financialization; secondly, through financialization indicators and urban real estate indicators,  relevant to the main dimensions, by comparing them with the EU average and with some  countries of the CEE and SEE. The findings may indicate the interweaving of the global financial and macroeconomic trends and the financial capital investment in the real estate markets with the urban re/development process.
PB  - Belgrade :  International Research Academy of Science and Art - IRASA
C3  - Book of Abstracts - IRASA International Scientific Conference Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI IV), 30 September - 1 October 2022, Belgrade
T1  - Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia
SP  - 62
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_814
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The paper explores the growing financialization in Serbia in the post-crisis period from 2008 to 2021. The research includes an overview of the theoretical background of  financialization based on the neoclassical and heterodox understandings of this process. The empirical analysis of the financialization of residential and non-residential properties at national level will be used. From the aspect of financialization, it would provide insight into the relationship between the financial system, macroeconomic developments and urban (re)development in the post-socialist practice. Moreover, a comparative ex-post analysis of the process of financialization in Serbia and the selected post-socialist countries of CEE and SEE based on the quantitative research will be presented. The empirical exploration shall be conducted within two domains: firstly, through the identification of different dimensions of financialization, such as  the transition from a bank-based to a  market-based financial system, the inflows of foreign financial investment (including FDI), the financialization of non-financial corporations and the population, and urban financialization; secondly, through financialization indicators and urban real estate indicators,  relevant to the main dimensions, by comparing them with the EU average and with some  countries of the CEE and SEE. The findings may indicate the interweaving of the global financial and macroeconomic trends and the financial capital investment in the real estate markets with the urban re/development process.",
publisher = "Belgrade :  International Research Academy of Science and Art - IRASA",
journal = "Book of Abstracts - IRASA International Scientific Conference Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI IV), 30 September - 1 October 2022, Belgrade",
title = "Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia",
pages = "62",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_814"
}
Zeković, S.. (2022). Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia. in Book of Abstracts - IRASA International Scientific Conference Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI IV), 30 September - 1 October 2022, Belgrade
Belgrade :  International Research Academy of Science and Art - IRASA., 62.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_814
Zeković S. Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia. in Book of Abstracts - IRASA International Scientific Conference Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI IV), 30 September - 1 October 2022, Belgrade. 2022;:62.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_814 .
Zeković, Slavka, "Post-socialist financialization: the experience of Serbia" in Book of Abstracts - IRASA International Scientific Conference Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (SETI IV), 30 September - 1 October 2022, Belgrade (2022):62,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_814 .

Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia

Zeković, Slavka

(International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR, KU Leuven- Faculty of Architecture, Ghent University- Faculty of Law and Criminology, HOGENT - Department of Real Estate, Brokery and Land Surveying, and University of Alberta - Faculty of Law, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://arch.kuleuven.be/plpr-2022/20220623-plpr2022-bookofabstracts.pdf
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/809
AB  - The paper explores the legalisation policies of illegally constructed buildings (ICBs) in Serbia in both socialist and post-socialist period. The restrictive urban policy and the inability of the socialist model to provide affordable housing have influenced the emergence of ICBs as an alternative method of meeting housing needs. The exogenous adoption of legalization policies, especially in the post-socialist period, based on the neoclassical approach and "mainstream" neoliberal development, without examining the social mechanisms of the endogenous decision-making on the emergence of ICBs, as well as reducing of planning role (e.g. a deviation of planning, avoiding or abandoning of planning) makes their implementation incomplete and unsuccessful. Given that the endogenous factors of mass construction of illegal buildings are fragmentarily involved in legalization policies, this paper introduces the conceptual framework of “credibility thesis” of specific institutional forms. 
This paper debriefs the changes in the credibility of legalization policy measures in the socialist and post-socialist context by using of the credibility analysis as a tool in the evaluation of legalization policies. Empirical analysis of ICBs in Serbia indicates the suitability and acceptability of a theoretical framework based on the “credibility thesis” for  the valorization of legalization policies. It can point to the desired direction of legalization policy, procedures and policy implementation mechanisms, and open a new perspective for improving its current performance. Also, here is supposed that the consequences of ICBs arise from their juxtaposition, non-ergodicity and “lock-in” status, i.e. the changes of the relationship in property rights, planning and laws. The issues of legitimacy and legal certainty of the ICBs could be reflected on legalization policy and possible long-term staying of illegality as a parallel system of property rights (with 2.1 million illegally constructed buildings out of 4.9 million in Serbia) with a inconceivable implications for urban planning.
PB  - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR, KU Leuven- Faculty of Architecture, Ghent University- Faculty of Law and Criminology, HOGENT - Department of Real Estate, Brokery and Land Surveying, and University of Alberta - Faculty of Law
C3  - Book of Abstracts - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR  16th Annual Conference ‘With or Without Limits’, Ghent, Belgium
T1  - Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia
SP  - 123
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_809
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The paper explores the legalisation policies of illegally constructed buildings (ICBs) in Serbia in both socialist and post-socialist period. The restrictive urban policy and the inability of the socialist model to provide affordable housing have influenced the emergence of ICBs as an alternative method of meeting housing needs. The exogenous adoption of legalization policies, especially in the post-socialist period, based on the neoclassical approach and "mainstream" neoliberal development, without examining the social mechanisms of the endogenous decision-making on the emergence of ICBs, as well as reducing of planning role (e.g. a deviation of planning, avoiding or abandoning of planning) makes their implementation incomplete and unsuccessful. Given that the endogenous factors of mass construction of illegal buildings are fragmentarily involved in legalization policies, this paper introduces the conceptual framework of “credibility thesis” of specific institutional forms. 
This paper debriefs the changes in the credibility of legalization policy measures in the socialist and post-socialist context by using of the credibility analysis as a tool in the evaluation of legalization policies. Empirical analysis of ICBs in Serbia indicates the suitability and acceptability of a theoretical framework based on the “credibility thesis” for  the valorization of legalization policies. It can point to the desired direction of legalization policy, procedures and policy implementation mechanisms, and open a new perspective for improving its current performance. Also, here is supposed that the consequences of ICBs arise from their juxtaposition, non-ergodicity and “lock-in” status, i.e. the changes of the relationship in property rights, planning and laws. The issues of legitimacy and legal certainty of the ICBs could be reflected on legalization policy and possible long-term staying of illegality as a parallel system of property rights (with 2.1 million illegally constructed buildings out of 4.9 million in Serbia) with a inconceivable implications for urban planning.",
publisher = "International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR, KU Leuven- Faculty of Architecture, Ghent University- Faculty of Law and Criminology, HOGENT - Department of Real Estate, Brokery and Land Surveying, and University of Alberta - Faculty of Law",
journal = "Book of Abstracts - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR  16th Annual Conference ‘With or Without Limits’, Ghent, Belgium",
title = "Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia",
pages = "123",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_809"
}
Zeković, S.. (2022). Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia. in Book of Abstracts - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR  16th Annual Conference ‘With or Without Limits’, Ghent, Belgium
International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR, KU Leuven- Faculty of Architecture, Ghent University- Faculty of Law and Criminology, HOGENT - Department of Real Estate, Brokery and Land Surveying, and University of Alberta - Faculty of Law., 123.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_809
Zeković S. Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia. in Book of Abstracts - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR  16th Annual Conference ‘With or Without Limits’, Ghent, Belgium. 2022;:123.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_809 .
Zeković, Slavka, "Towards a credible legalization policy in Serbia" in Book of Abstracts - International Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights/PLPR  16th Annual Conference ‘With or Without Limits’, Ghent, Belgium (2022):123,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_809 .

Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront

Zeković, Slavka; Maričić, Tamara

(Regional AStudies Association, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/561
AB  - The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.
PB  - Regional AStudies Association
PB  - Routledge
T2  - Territory, Politics, Governance
T1  - Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
SP  - 527
EP  - 548
DO  - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.",
publisher = "Regional AStudies Association, Routledge",
journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance",
title = "Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront",
volume = "10",
number = "4",
pages = "527-548",
doi = "10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410"
}
Zeković, S.,& Maričić, T.. (2022). Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance
Regional AStudies Association., 10(4), 527-548.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zeković S, Maričić T. Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance. 2022;10(4):527-548.
doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 .
Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, "Contemporary governance of urban mega-  projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront" in Territory, Politics, Governance, 10, no. 4 (2022):527-548,
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 . .
5
2
7

Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe

Hadžić, Miroljub; Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
AB  - The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe
IS  - 48
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT220603009H
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe",
number = "48",
pages = "1-10",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT220603009H"
}
Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2022). Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.(48), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H
Hadžić M, Zeković S. Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium. 2022;(48):1-10.
doi:10.2298/SPAT220603009H .
Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe" in Spatium, no. 48 (2022):1-10,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H . .

The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development

Zeković, Slavka

(Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia, 2021)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/841
AB  - The paper examines the post-socialist industrial development, industrial policy (IP), regional specialization and spatial distribution in the part of South-Eastern Europe, i.e. in so-called "Western Balkans" (SEE-WB), and, especially in Serbia. The research includes an overview of the theoretical basis of industrial policy, as well as the European RIS framework, which is also prescribed for the countries joining the EU (in order to make the Smart Specialization Strategy). A comparative ex-post analysis of industrial development and spatial distribution in the SEE-WB is based on quantitative exploration. The results of a comparative analysis of industrial concentration and regional specialization in the analyzed period highlight the weak regional diversification of industrial activity. Despite the predictions that political and economic integration will lead to an increase in regional industrial specialization, the quantitative results show the opposite trend in the SEE-WB, as well as an absence of regional integration in terms of specialization and spatialization. Also, the paper explores the industrial development and strategic perspectives of the new Serbian IP and territorial development. The new IP can cause different impacts on the territorial development, planning and governance. Some recommendations for improving the IP and reducing spatial inequalities in the SEE-WB would be given.
PB  - Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia
C3  - Book of Abstracts, "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation", Zagreb, September 17, 2021
T1  - The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development
SP  - 46
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The paper examines the post-socialist industrial development, industrial policy (IP), regional specialization and spatial distribution in the part of South-Eastern Europe, i.e. in so-called "Western Balkans" (SEE-WB), and, especially in Serbia. The research includes an overview of the theoretical basis of industrial policy, as well as the European RIS framework, which is also prescribed for the countries joining the EU (in order to make the Smart Specialization Strategy). A comparative ex-post analysis of industrial development and spatial distribution in the SEE-WB is based on quantitative exploration. The results of a comparative analysis of industrial concentration and regional specialization in the analyzed period highlight the weak regional diversification of industrial activity. Despite the predictions that political and economic integration will lead to an increase in regional industrial specialization, the quantitative results show the opposite trend in the SEE-WB, as well as an absence of regional integration in terms of specialization and spatialization. Also, the paper explores the industrial development and strategic perspectives of the new Serbian IP and territorial development. The new IP can cause different impacts on the territorial development, planning and governance. Some recommendations for improving the IP and reducing spatial inequalities in the SEE-WB would be given.",
publisher = "Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation", Zagreb, September 17, 2021",
title = "The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development",
pages = "46"
}
Zeković, S.. (2021). The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development. in Book of Abstracts, "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation", Zagreb, September 17, 2021
Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia., 46.
Zeković S. The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development. in Book of Abstracts, "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation", Zagreb, September 17, 2021. 2021;:46..
Zeković, Slavka, "The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development" in Book of Abstracts, "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation", Zagreb, September 17, 2021 (2021):46.

The Regional Industrial Policy and Territorial Development

Zeković, Slavka

(Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia, 2021)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/840
AB  - The paper examines the post-socialist industrial development, industrial policy (IP), regional specialization and spatial distribution in the part of South-Eastern Europe, i.e. in so-called Western Balkans (SEE-WB), and, especially in Serbia. The research includes an overview of the theoretical basis of industrial policy, as well as the European RIS framework, which is also prescribed for the countries joining the EU (in order to make the Smart Specialization Strategy). A comparative ex-post analysis of industrial development and spatial distribution in the SEE-WB is based on quantitative exploration. The results of a comparative analysis of industrial concentration and regional specialization in the analyzed period highlight the weak regional diversification of industrial activity. Despite the predictions that political and economic integration will lead to an increase in regional industrial specialization, the quantitative results show the opposite trend in the SEE-WB, as well as an absence of regional integration in terms of specialization and spatialization. Also, the paper explores the industrial development and strategic perspectives of the new Serbian IP and territorial development. The new IP can cause different impacts on the territorial development, planning and governance. Some recommendations for improving the IP and reducing spatial inequalities in the SEE-WB are given.
PB  - Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia
C3  - Book of Proceedings IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art, Zagreb, September 17, 2021
T1  - The Regional  Industrial Policy and Territorial Development
SP  - 379
EP  - 398
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The paper examines the post-socialist industrial development, industrial policy (IP), regional specialization and spatial distribution in the part of South-Eastern Europe, i.e. in so-called Western Balkans (SEE-WB), and, especially in Serbia. The research includes an overview of the theoretical basis of industrial policy, as well as the European RIS framework, which is also prescribed for the countries joining the EU (in order to make the Smart Specialization Strategy). A comparative ex-post analysis of industrial development and spatial distribution in the SEE-WB is based on quantitative exploration. The results of a comparative analysis of industrial concentration and regional specialization in the analyzed period highlight the weak regional diversification of industrial activity. Despite the predictions that political and economic integration will lead to an increase in regional industrial specialization, the quantitative results show the opposite trend in the SEE-WB, as well as an absence of regional integration in terms of specialization and spatialization. Also, the paper explores the industrial development and strategic perspectives of the new Serbian IP and territorial development. The new IP can cause different impacts on the territorial development, planning and governance. Some recommendations for improving the IP and reducing spatial inequalities in the SEE-WB are given.",
publisher = "Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia",
journal = "Book of Proceedings IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art, Zagreb, September 17, 2021",
title = "The Regional  Industrial Policy and Territorial Development",
pages = "379-398"
}
Zeković, S.. (2021). The Regional  Industrial Policy and Territorial Development. in Book of Proceedings IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art, Zagreb, September 17, 2021
Zagreb : IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art Department for the Republic of Croatia., 379-398.
Zeković S. The Regional  Industrial Policy and Territorial Development. in Book of Proceedings IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art, Zagreb, September 17, 2021. 2021;:379-398..
Zeković, Slavka, "The Regional  Industrial Policy and Territorial Development" in Book of Proceedings IRASA – International Research Academy of Science and Art, Zagreb, September 17, 2021 (2021):379-398.

Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance

Zeković, Slavka

(Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic : Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://plpr2020.ujep.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/book_of_abstracts_PLPR2020.pdf
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/812
AB  - The paper explores the land-use planning and governance of the urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instruments of post-industrial urban development towards the real estate financialization, on the example of Belgrade Waterfront Project.  Bearing in mind their substantial impacts UMPs often attract  high-end market, public and political interests. UMPs are result of decision-making by different policy-makers and stakeholders that are market-derived and supported by different public and development policies. UMPs are increasingly becoming mighty instruments of smart urban transformation, city re-imaging and one of the key constituent structures of the smart city, i.e. the conversion of sustainable integrated urban development into the smart city concept. They are a product of high technology, extreme engineering, ICT, architectural design with the smart “iconic” and energy-efficient buildings. The paper emphasizes that UMPs are the strong instruments of global economic development in the smart cities, especially in real estate sector and hi-tech urban infrastructure. Here will be analyzed a global features of UMPs as well as key challenges (regulatory, institutional, financial, governance). Various aspects of UMPs make them extremely complex: huge size, sometimes unpredictable outcomes and diverse multi-scale impacts. Their implementation is often accompanied by undesired conflicts in governance arena.  The role of the UMPs in the development of smart cities is growing. The paper indicates a new phenomena -“zero-friction” society with the aim of global development relying on UMPs in the smart cities digital multiverse. It is emphasized that urban development are influenced by different approaches related to planning and governance system for the large development projects (UMPs). Complexity of UMPs require new approaches in decision-making, planning and governance. They should be based and adapted to the integrated, inclusive and sustainable  perspectives. Some recommendations for the further research and improvement of UMPs governance in the cities, especially more innovative urban land tools, will be highlighted.
PB  - Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic : Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University
PB  - International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights (PLPR)
C3  - Book of abstracts -14th International Conference on Planning, Law and Property Rights "Post-industrial diamond", International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, and Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
T1  - Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance
SP  - 236
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_812
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper explores the land-use planning and governance of the urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instruments of post-industrial urban development towards the real estate financialization, on the example of Belgrade Waterfront Project.  Bearing in mind their substantial impacts UMPs often attract  high-end market, public and political interests. UMPs are result of decision-making by different policy-makers and stakeholders that are market-derived and supported by different public and development policies. UMPs are increasingly becoming mighty instruments of smart urban transformation, city re-imaging and one of the key constituent structures of the smart city, i.e. the conversion of sustainable integrated urban development into the smart city concept. They are a product of high technology, extreme engineering, ICT, architectural design with the smart “iconic” and energy-efficient buildings. The paper emphasizes that UMPs are the strong instruments of global economic development in the smart cities, especially in real estate sector and hi-tech urban infrastructure. Here will be analyzed a global features of UMPs as well as key challenges (regulatory, institutional, financial, governance). Various aspects of UMPs make them extremely complex: huge size, sometimes unpredictable outcomes and diverse multi-scale impacts. Their implementation is often accompanied by undesired conflicts in governance arena.  The role of the UMPs in the development of smart cities is growing. The paper indicates a new phenomena -“zero-friction” society with the aim of global development relying on UMPs in the smart cities digital multiverse. It is emphasized that urban development are influenced by different approaches related to planning and governance system for the large development projects (UMPs). Complexity of UMPs require new approaches in decision-making, planning and governance. They should be based and adapted to the integrated, inclusive and sustainable  perspectives. Some recommendations for the further research and improvement of UMPs governance in the cities, especially more innovative urban land tools, will be highlighted.",
publisher = "Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic : Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights (PLPR)",
journal = "Book of abstracts -14th International Conference on Planning, Law and Property Rights "Post-industrial diamond", International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, and Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic",
title = "Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance",
pages = "236",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_812"
}
Zeković, S.. (2020). Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance. in Book of abstracts -14th International Conference on Planning, Law and Property Rights "Post-industrial diamond", International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, and Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic : Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University., 236.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_812
Zeković S. Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance. in Book of abstracts -14th International Conference on Planning, Law and Property Rights "Post-industrial diamond", International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, and Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. 2020;:236.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_812 .
Zeković, Slavka, "Urban megaprojects as instruments of urban development and governance" in Book of abstracts -14th International Conference on Planning, Law and Property Rights "Post-industrial diamond", International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, and Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic (2020):236,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_812 .

Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације

Зековић, Славка; Хаџић, Мирољуб

(Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Зековић, Славка
AU  - Хаџић, Мирољуб
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/583
AB  - У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја), јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику.
AB  - The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T2  - Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији
T1  - Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације
T1  - Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications
SP  - 27
EP  - 66
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Зековић, Славка and Хаџић, Мирољуб",
year = "2020",
abstract = "У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја), јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику., The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
journal = "Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији",
booktitle = "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације, Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications",
pages = "27-66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583"
}
Зековић, С.,& Хаџић, М.. (2020). Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије., 27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583
Зековић С, Хаџић М. Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији. 2020;:27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583 .
Зековић, Славка, Хаџић, Мирољуб, "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације" in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког  мишљења и управљања у Србији (2020):27-66,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_583 .

A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development

Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/565
AB  - The paper will analyze the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It will indicate the key issues of Serbian industry, explore the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development. An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy will be applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper will indicate global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. The work becomes less conditioned on distance and space-time continuum. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR to the territorial planning and governance.  The real opportunities for the Serbian industry will be given in the paper,  Serbian S3 and some recommendations for their improvement and territorial governance.
PB  - Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts
T1  - A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development
SP  - 86
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_565
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper will analyze the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It will indicate the key issues of Serbian industry, explore the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development. An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy will be applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper will indicate global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. The work becomes less conditioned on distance and space-time continuum. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR to the territorial planning and governance.  The real opportunities for the Serbian industry will be given in the paper,  Serbian S3 and some recommendations for their improvement and territorial governance.",
publisher = "Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts",
title = "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development",
pages = "86",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_565"
}
Zeković, S.. (2020). A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts
Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art., 86.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_565
Zeković S. A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts. 2020;:86.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_565 .
Zeković, Slavka, "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation /SETI II Book of Abstracts (2020):86,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_565 .

A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development

Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/564
AB  - The paper analyzes the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the
theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the
influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It is indicated the key issues of Serbian industry, explored the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development.An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy has been applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper has indicated global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the regions and cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR and industrial policy to the territorial planning and governance. The real opportunities for the Serbian industrial policy are given in the paper as well as some recommendations for its improvement.
PB  - Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings
T1  - A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development
SP  - 549
EP  - 562
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_564
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper analyzes the post-socialist industrial development of Serbia and the
theoretical and empirical propaedeutics on new industrial policy (under the
influence of the EU industrial policy, globalization process and the Fourth Industrial Revolution/4IR). It is indicated the key issues of Serbian industry, explored the strategic perspectives of a new industrial policy of Serbia, and its possible impacts on territorial development.An analytical framework of the globalization theory regarding a new industrial policy has been applied in the paper, as well as the European RIS framework, which was prescribed for the EU accession countries, in preparation of their "Strategy of Smart Specialization"/S3. The paper has indicated global challenges of the new industrial policy under disruptive technological changes, uncertain growth and precarious employment. The global framework for a new industrial policy causes a new spatial configuration, especially in the regions and cities, such as a new production platforms and diffusion of new work-spaces. It indicates a new shift of the possible implications of 4IR and industrial policy to the territorial planning and governance. The real opportunities for the Serbian industrial policy are given in the paper as well as some recommendations for its improvement.",
publisher = "Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings",
title = "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development",
pages = "549-562",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_564"
}
Zeković, S.. (2020). A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings
Belgrade : IRASA / International Research Academy of Science and Art., 549-562.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_564
Zeković S. A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings. 2020;:549-562.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_564 .
Zeković, Slavka, "A propaedeutics of Serbia's new industrial policy and its impact on territorial development" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation/SETI II 2020 Book of Proceedings (2020):549-562,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_564 .

The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia

Zeković, Slavka; Petovar, Ksenija; Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham

(Elsevier, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Petovar, Ksenija
AU  - Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/563
AB  - This paper explores the legalization of mass illegal and informal construction (IIC) in Serbia (with particular reference to the city of Belgrade). It analyzes the credibility of the socialist and post-socialist institutional frameworks on IIC predicated upon the “credibility thesis” – an evolutionary understanding of institutions and their path-dependent development. In the empirical analysis, the measures of state policies were interpreted, assessed, and summarized in accordance with the Credibility Scales and Intervention (CSI) checklist. During the 1960s, a restrictive urban policy and the impossibility of the socialist model to provide affordable residential space due to fast urbanization, IIC consequently became an alternative method for meeting housing needs. In the 1990s, the socialist development model was transformed into one that was post-socialist. A new wave of IIC ensued due to the privatization of land-use and tenancy rights, and its vast scale has been a key driver for accommodating flows of immigrants after the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During this period, the Serbian State stimulated policies that are more credible to facilitate, formalize, and condone IIC. It is concluded that IIC in Serbia cannot be fully averted while legalization policies have, to date, been unsuccessful and non-credible.
PB  - Elsevier
T2  - Cities
T1  - The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia
IS  - 97
SP  - 1
EP  - 12
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Petovar, Ksenija and Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper explores the legalization of mass illegal and informal construction (IIC) in Serbia (with particular reference to the city of Belgrade). It analyzes the credibility of the socialist and post-socialist institutional frameworks on IIC predicated upon the “credibility thesis” – an evolutionary understanding of institutions and their path-dependent development. In the empirical analysis, the measures of state policies were interpreted, assessed, and summarized in accordance with the Credibility Scales and Intervention (CSI) checklist. During the 1960s, a restrictive urban policy and the impossibility of the socialist model to provide affordable residential space due to fast urbanization, IIC consequently became an alternative method for meeting housing needs. In the 1990s, the socialist development model was transformed into one that was post-socialist. A new wave of IIC ensued due to the privatization of land-use and tenancy rights, and its vast scale has been a key driver for accommodating flows of immigrants after the break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. During this period, the Serbian State stimulated policies that are more credible to facilitate, formalize, and condone IIC. It is concluded that IIC in Serbia cannot be fully averted while legalization policies have, to date, been unsuccessful and non-credible.",
publisher = "Elsevier",
journal = "Cities",
title = "The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia",
number = "97",
pages = "1-12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548"
}
Zeković, S., Petovar, K.,& Bin Md Saman, N.. (2020). The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia. in Cities
Elsevier.(97), 1-12.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548
Zeković S, Petovar K, Bin Md Saman N. The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia. in Cities. 2020;(97):1-12.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548 .
Zeković, Slavka, Petovar, Ksenija, Bin Md Saman, Nor-Hisham, "The credibility of illegal and informal construction: Assessing legalization policies in Serbia" in Cities, no. 97 (2020):1-12,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102548 . .

Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године)

Милић, Ђорђе; Тркуља, Синиша; Радосављевић, Зоран; Чолић, Ратка; Максин, Марија; Зековић, Славка; Ненковић-Ризнић, Марина; Манић, Божидар; Џелебџић, Омиљена; Ђукић, Александар; Јокановић, Игор; Петрић, Јасна; Никовић, Ана; Даниловић Христић, Наташа; Бајић, Тања; Чолић, Наташа; Бранков, Борјан

(Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије, 2019)


                                            

                                            
Милић, Ђ., Тркуља, С., Радосављевић, З., Чолић, Р., Максин, М., Зековић, С., Ненковић-Ризнић, М., Манић, Б., Џелебџић, О., Ђукић, А., Јокановић, И., Петрић, Ј., Никовић, А., Даниловић Христић, Н., Бајић, Т., Чолић, Н.,& Бранков, Б.. (2019). Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године). 
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790
Милић Ђ, Тркуља С, Радосављевић З, Чолић Р, Максин М, Зековић С, Ненковић-Ризнић М, Манић Б, Џелебџић О, Ђукић А, Јокановић И, Петрић Ј, Никовић А, Даниловић Христић Н, Бајић Т, Чолић Н, Бранков Б. Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године). 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790 .
Милић, Ђорђе, Тркуља, Синиша, Радосављевић, Зоран, Чолић, Ратка, Максин, Марија, Зековић, Славка, Ненковић-Ризнић, Марина, Манић, Божидар, Џелебџић, Омиљена, Ђукић, Александар, Јокановић, Игор, Петрић, Јасна, Никовић, Ана, Даниловић Христић, Наташа, Бајић, Тања, Чолић, Наташа, Бранков, Борјан, "Нови методолошки приступ интегрисаном управљању одрживим урбаним развојем у Републици Србији (на примеру Стратегије одрживог урбаног развоја Републике Србије до 2030. године)" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_790 .

The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development

Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia, 2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/508
AB  - The aim of the paper is to explore the perspectives of the new industrial policy of Serbia (in line with the Fourth Industrial revolution/4IR) and its un/predictable impacts on cities. It will discuss the
main requirements of the 4IR (the expected shifts, challenges and effects) and the European concept of the “Research and Innovation Systems”/RIS as the multi-dimensional framework for the national “Strategy of Smart Specialization”/S3. These concepts have an important role for urban development, urban policy and urban economy. The paper indicates that the relationship between the movement and allocation of capital and territoriality of political power is a global challenge, which creates spatial configurations, such as smart cities superstructures, urban mega-projects and infrastructures. It opens the question of how to adapt to the new economic order in line to 4IR, especially due to complexity of globalization risks, shifting boundaries of urban governability, creation of new urban structures, possible conflicts and uncertain self-governance of the cities. A conflict between two different views is often refracted in cities: the logic of capital and territorial (political) decision-making. The interdependence of the globalization and the urbanization can contribute to redefinition of the economic and industrial policies and their impact on reshaping of (smart) urban structures, i.e. governance before urban super-structures. An analytical and conceptual framework of the theory of globalization will be applied in the research of a new Serbian S3 and its impact assessment on urban development. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic fields, some innovative products and services, consequent urban changes, and provide a reliable assessment of implementation, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economy (jobless, sustainable, innovative, de-growth, sacrificing growth and deceptive growth) in an underdeveloped country. The paper offers some recommendations for perspectival intelligence-smart thinking about the future, real, and critical planning and governance.
PB  - Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia
PB  - Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography
C3  - Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city
T1  - The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development
SP  - 301
EP  - 301
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_508
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to explore the perspectives of the new industrial policy of Serbia (in line with the Fourth Industrial revolution/4IR) and its un/predictable impacts on cities. It will discuss the
main requirements of the 4IR (the expected shifts, challenges and effects) and the European concept of the “Research and Innovation Systems”/RIS as the multi-dimensional framework for the national “Strategy of Smart Specialization”/S3. These concepts have an important role for urban development, urban policy and urban economy. The paper indicates that the relationship between the movement and allocation of capital and territoriality of political power is a global challenge, which creates spatial configurations, such as smart cities superstructures, urban mega-projects and infrastructures. It opens the question of how to adapt to the new economic order in line to 4IR, especially due to complexity of globalization risks, shifting boundaries of urban governability, creation of new urban structures, possible conflicts and uncertain self-governance of the cities. A conflict between two different views is often refracted in cities: the logic of capital and territorial (political) decision-making. The interdependence of the globalization and the urbanization can contribute to redefinition of the economic and industrial policies and their impact on reshaping of (smart) urban structures, i.e. governance before urban super-structures. An analytical and conceptual framework of the theory of globalization will be applied in the research of a new Serbian S3 and its impact assessment on urban development. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic fields, some innovative products and services, consequent urban changes, and provide a reliable assessment of implementation, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economy (jobless, sustainable, innovative, de-growth, sacrificing growth and deceptive growth) in an underdeveloped country. The paper offers some recommendations for perspectival intelligence-smart thinking about the future, real, and critical planning and governance.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia, Belgrade : University of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography",
journal = "Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city",
title = "The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development",
pages = "301-301",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_508"
}
Zeković, S.. (2019). The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development. in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city
Belgrade : Academy of Engineering Sciences of Serbia., 301-301.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_508
Zeković S. The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development. in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city. 2019;:301-301.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_508 .
Zeković, Slavka, "The New Industrial Policy of Serbia and Possible Consequences on Urban Development" in Book of Proceedings: e-Future of Cities – between temptations of exponential technology growth and the concept of human city (2019):301-301,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_508 .

Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације

Зековић, Славка; Хаџић, Мирољуб

(Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Зековић, Славка
AU  - Хаџић, Мирољуб
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/718
AB  - У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја),јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику.
AB  - The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post-socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.
PB  - Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије
T2  - Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији
T1  - Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације
T1  - Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications
IS  - Посебна издања, бр.88
SP  - 27
EP  - 66
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Зековић, Славка and Хаџић, Мирољуб",
year = "2019",
abstract = "У раду се анализира постојећи индустријски развој у Србији у постсоцијалистичком периоду и реалне могућности његовог опоравка под утицајем процеса глобализације и савременог оквира Четврте индустријске револуције (4ИР). Овај рад истражује српску индустрију од краја 20. века до данас,посебноимајућиувидуразличитакретањау транзиционимусловимаиу кризном периоду (нпр. јака деиндустријализација, повећање територијалних/ регионалних развојних разлика, некохерентности између продуктивности и иновативних капацитета за одрживи развој, заостајање у конкурентности индустрије). И поред неколико стратешких докумената које је усвојила Србија (Стратегија и политика развоја индустрије Србије 2010-2020; Просторни план Републике Србије; Стратегија развоја Југоисточне Европе до 2020; развојна документарегионалногразвоја),јошнисурешена главнапитањаиндустријског (и економског) развоја. Постојећа политика индустријског развоја не укључује просторне специфичности. То имплицира даљу концентрацију индустрије у метрополскомподручју Београда и Новог Сада и заостајање развоја у знатном делу Србије. Циљ рада је да истражи могуће перспективе нове индустријске политике Србије, као и њене импликације на регионални развој и просторну кохезију. Посебан осврт посвећен је елементима нове индустријске политике ЕУ (тј.„истраживања и иновативних система”/РИС) каомулти-димензионалном оквиру за припрему националне „стратегије смарт специјализације”/С3. С3 чини окосницу за ре/обликовање нове индустријске политике Србије. Будућа С3 Србије требало би да идентификује стратешке области за интервенцију, да промовише креирање неких иновативних производа и услуга у складу са растом заснованим на иновацијама, да предвиди могуће последичне просторне промене и да обезбеди поуздане алате за имплементацију, имајући у виду реалне могућности за развој „смарт“ економије у неразвијеној земљи. У раду су дате неке препоруке за побољшање концептуалног приступа за будућу националну индустријску политику., The paper analyzes the existing industrial development in Serbia in the post-socialist period and the real possibilities for its recovery under the influence of the globalization process and current/ongoing framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This paper explores the Serbian industry from the end of the 20th century till now, especially bearing in mind the different movements in transition conditions and in the crisis period (e.g. strong de-industrialization, increase of territorial/regional development differences, disjuncture between productivity and innovative capacities for sustainable development, lagging of competitiveness of industry). Despite of several strategic documents adopted by Serbia (Industrial Development Strategy and Policy of Serbia until 2020; Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia; South East Europe 2020 Strategy; developmental documents of regional development) yet have not solved the basic issues of industrial (and economic) development. The current policy of industrial development does not include spatial specificities. This implies further concentration of industry in the metropolitan area of Belgrade and Novi Sad and lagging of development in a greater part of Serbia. The aim of the paper is to explore the possible perspectives of Serbia‘s new industrial policy, as well as its implications for regional development and territorial cohesion. A special review was devoted to the elements of the new EU industrial policy (i.e., the „Research and Innovation Systems“/RIS) as a multi-dimensional framework for the preparation of the national „Smart Specialization Strategy“/S3. S3 is the backbone for re/design of a new industrial policy in Serbia. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention, to promote creation of some innovative products and services in line with the innovation-led growth, to predict the consequent spatial changes, and provide a reliable implementation tools, bearing in mind the real opportunities for the smart economic development in an underdeveloped country. In the paper are given some recommendations for improvement of the conceptual approach in a future national industrial policy.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије",
journal = "Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији",
booktitle = "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације, Perspectives of a new Serbian industrial policy and its implications",
number = "Посебна издања, бр.88",
pages = "27-66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718"
}
Зековић, С.,& Хаџић, М.. (2019). Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији
Београд : Институт за архитектуру и урбанизам Србије.(Посебна издања, бр.88), 27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718
Зековић С, Хаџић М. Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације. in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији. 2019;(Посебна издања, бр.88):27-66.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718 .
Зековић, Славка, Хаџић, Мирољуб, "Перспективе нове индустријске политике у Србији и њене импликације" in Теоријска, развојна и примењена истраживања просторних процеса за обнову стратешког мишљења и управљања у Србији, no. Посебна издања, бр.88 (2019):27-66,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_718 .

Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia

Hadžić, Miroljub; Zeković, Slavka

(Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/507
AB  - The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.
PB  - Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia
IS  - 41
SP  - 14
EP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.",
publisher = "Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia",
number = "41",
pages = "14-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507"
}
Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2019). Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium
Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia.(41), 14-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507
Hadžić M, Zeković S. Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium. 2019;(41):14-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507 .
Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia" in Spatium, no. 41 (2019):14-22,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507 .

The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia

Zeković, Slavka

(Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art, 2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/466
AB  - This paper explores the economic and industrial development in Serbia, and the possibilities for their recovery based on the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The paper has two aims: first, to provide a brief review of the economic development in Serbia; and second, to give some recommendations for the re/neo-industrialization strategy or the Strategy Smart Specialization (S3) in accordance with the new European industrial policy (based on the 4IR and "research and innovation systems" - RISs). An analytical and conceptual framework has been applied for the understanding and improvement of a new industrial policy by S3. Research is based on the preliminary use of a data-driven approach in a multi-dimensional framework related to the 4IR. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention and promote the creation of innovative products and services in several domains. Some recommendations are also given for the preparation of S3 in line with the innovation-led growth. The new Serbian economy based on S3 should support sectoral modernization, competitiveness, and effective transformation in accordance with the requirements of the 4IR and the real possibilities for their implementation.
PB  - Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art
C3  - Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)
T1  - The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia
SP  - 399
EP  - 409
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_466
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper explores the economic and industrial development in Serbia, and the possibilities for their recovery based on the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The paper has two aims: first, to provide a brief review of the economic development in Serbia; and second, to give some recommendations for the re/neo-industrialization strategy or the Strategy Smart Specialization (S3) in accordance with the new European industrial policy (based on the 4IR and "research and innovation systems" - RISs). An analytical and conceptual framework has been applied for the understanding and improvement of a new industrial policy by S3. Research is based on the preliminary use of a data-driven approach in a multi-dimensional framework related to the 4IR. The future Serbian S3 should identify the strategic areas for intervention and promote the creation of innovative products and services in several domains. Some recommendations are also given for the preparation of S3 in line with the innovation-led growth. The new Serbian economy based on S3 should support sectoral modernization, competitiveness, and effective transformation in accordance with the requirements of the 4IR and the real possibilities for their implementation.",
publisher = "Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art",
journal = "Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)",
title = "The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia",
pages = "399-409",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_466"
}
Zeković, S.. (2019). The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings)
Belgrade : International Research Academy of Science and Art., 399-409.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_466
Zeković S. The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia. in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings). 2019;:399-409.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_466 .
Zeković, Slavka, "The contribution to the making of the new industrial policy of Serbia" in Science, Education, Technology and Innovation (Book of Proceedings) (2019):399-409,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_466 .

Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade

Slaev, Aleksandar; Zeković, Slavka; Kovachev, Atanas; Maričić, Tamara; Bajić, Tanja

(Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Bajić, Tanja
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/364
AB  - Like most European cities, cities in South-east Europe (SEE) have been growing throughout the 20th century, however, since the end of the 1980s, the mechanisms of urban growth and expansion have changed radically: from development fully determined by central planning to market-led urban development. This paper examines how planning in large SEE cities is coping with the challenge to balance the action of the market and achieve planning goals relating to the form of urban growth and expansion. As case studies we analyse the master plans of Sofia and Belgrade and their implementation. We have two research questions: first, whether planning in the two cities has considered the role of the market when defining its objectives, measures and solutions regarding the forms of urban growth and the development of in suburban areas, and, second, whether planning has been able to influence the market or cooperate with it in order to achieve its objectives in suburban development.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade
IS  - 39
SP  - 38
EP  - 46
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT1839038S
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Slaev, Aleksandar and Zeković, Slavka and Kovachev, Atanas and Maričić, Tamara and Bajić, Tanja",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Like most European cities, cities in South-east Europe (SEE) have been growing throughout the 20th century, however, since the end of the 1980s, the mechanisms of urban growth and expansion have changed radically: from development fully determined by central planning to market-led urban development. This paper examines how planning in large SEE cities is coping with the challenge to balance the action of the market and achieve planning goals relating to the form of urban growth and expansion. As case studies we analyse the master plans of Sofia and Belgrade and their implementation. We have two research questions: first, whether planning in the two cities has considered the role of the market when defining its objectives, measures and solutions regarding the forms of urban growth and the development of in suburban areas, and, second, whether planning has been able to influence the market or cooperate with it in order to achieve its objectives in suburban development.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade",
number = "39",
pages = "38-46",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT1839038S"
}
Slaev, A., Zeković, S., Kovachev, A., Maričić, T.,& Bajić, T.. (2018). Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia.(39), 38-46.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839038S
Slaev A, Zeković S, Kovachev A, Maričić T, Bajić T. Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade. in Spatium. 2018;(39):38-46.
doi:10.2298/SPAT1839038S .
Slaev, Aleksandar, Zeković, Slavka, Kovachev, Atanas, Maričić, Tamara, Bajić, Tanja, "Regulating market-led urban expansion in the new master plans of Sofia and Belgrade" in Spatium, no. 39 (2018):38-46,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839038S . .
1

Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors

Zeković, Slavka; Vujošević, Miodrag

(Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://www.spuds.edu.rs/downloads/2eng.pdf.
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/363
AB  - The aim of this paper is to provide a systematized overview of urban land policy in Serbia, primarily regarding the impact of key contextual factors (historical, institutional, legal, etc.). Various historical and developmental contexts have caused regulation changes concerning construction land and its impact on the urban development in Serbia from the mid-19th century to the beginning of the 1990s. The analysis starts with an overview of the theoretical background of urban development policy and land regulation, followed by a brief reflection on the impact of key historical and legislative factors focused on the post-socialist period. The analysis of the urban land policy in the post-socialist period includes: key legislation; ownership status of construction land and property rights; conversion of ownership status; general policy instruments; key urban land management issues in Serbian cities; and a preliminary evaluation of the implementation effects of the existing urban land system in Serbia. Several research methods have been applied here, viz., the conceptual benchmarking framework for the dominant legal doctrine; a general qualitative analysis of the contemporary context; institutional and comparative analyses, etc. Although the former socialist concept of the welfare state has been transformed into a neoliberal concept in a short period, there is an evident delay in the reforms of the Serbian urban land policy. The paper presents numerous findings regarding the impact of the current system and practice on the general urban land policy in Serbia, while also focusing on the concomitant developments in the Belgrade Area. The paper concludes with the recommendations regarding the harmonisation and innovation of urban land policy and urban development policy in Serbia in the post-socialist era.
PB  - Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Support to process of urban development
T1  - Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors
SP  - 29
EP  - 58
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_363
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to provide a systematized overview of urban land policy in Serbia, primarily regarding the impact of key contextual factors (historical, institutional, legal, etc.). Various historical and developmental contexts have caused regulation changes concerning construction land and its impact on the urban development in Serbia from the mid-19th century to the beginning of the 1990s. The analysis starts with an overview of the theoretical background of urban development policy and land regulation, followed by a brief reflection on the impact of key historical and legislative factors focused on the post-socialist period. The analysis of the urban land policy in the post-socialist period includes: key legislation; ownership status of construction land and property rights; conversion of ownership status; general policy instruments; key urban land management issues in Serbian cities; and a preliminary evaluation of the implementation effects of the existing urban land system in Serbia. Several research methods have been applied here, viz., the conceptual benchmarking framework for the dominant legal doctrine; a general qualitative analysis of the contemporary context; institutional and comparative analyses, etc. Although the former socialist concept of the welfare state has been transformed into a neoliberal concept in a short period, there is an evident delay in the reforms of the Serbian urban land policy. The paper presents numerous findings regarding the impact of the current system and practice on the general urban land policy in Serbia, while also focusing on the concomitant developments in the Belgrade Area. The paper concludes with the recommendations regarding the harmonisation and innovation of urban land policy and urban development policy in Serbia in the post-socialist era.",
publisher = "Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Support to process of urban development",
booktitle = "Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors",
pages = "29-58",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_363"
}
Zeković, S.,& Vujošević, M.. (2018). Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors. in Support to process of urban development
Lausanne : CODEV - Swiss Cooperation & Development Center at EPFL - École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne., 29-58.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_363
Zeković S, Vujošević M. Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors. in Support to process of urban development. 2018;:29-58.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_363 .
Zeković, Slavka, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Land construction and urban development policy in Serbia: impact of key contextual factors" in Support to process of urban development (2018):29-58,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_363 .

Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront

Zeković, Slavka; Maričić, Tamara; Vujošević, Miodrag

(Cham : Springer, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/357
AB  - The research analyzed the theoretical and methodological background of urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instrument of urban planning and development, with specific reference to the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In analysis we combined a contextually appropriate ap-proach, some elements of the phronetic planning approach and the benchmarking analysis of megaproject planning and development. BWP induced a change of the institutional framework (introduction of specific legal and policy instruments), as a key source of future changes in the metropolitan tissue. Preliminary impact assessment of the BWP indicates: slow development & economic effects, low transparency, social inequalities, marginal social mobilization and weak networks between the key actors, public funds overuse, impact on law-making, displacement impacts, high public financial risk, deep urban transformations, environmental impacts, medium-technological modernization, etc. This research highlights the differences in the political, institutional, social and economic environment that shape the BWP. It provides recommendations for future research and application, improvement of planning approach and continuing in-depth analysis for managing the undesirable consequences of the UMPs, including the determination of the interplay between different pools of power.
PB  - Cham : Springer
T2  - Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact
T1  - Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront
SP  - 153
EP  - 164
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Vujošević, Miodrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The research analyzed the theoretical and methodological background of urban megaprojects (UMPs) as instrument of urban planning and development, with specific reference to the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In analysis we combined a contextually appropriate ap-proach, some elements of the phronetic planning approach and the benchmarking analysis of megaproject planning and development. BWP induced a change of the institutional framework (introduction of specific legal and policy instruments), as a key source of future changes in the metropolitan tissue. Preliminary impact assessment of the BWP indicates: slow development & economic effects, low transparency, social inequalities, marginal social mobilization and weak networks between the key actors, public funds overuse, impact on law-making, displacement impacts, high public financial risk, deep urban transformations, environmental impacts, medium-technological modernization, etc. This research highlights the differences in the political, institutional, social and economic environment that shape the BWP. It provides recommendations for future research and application, improvement of planning approach and continuing in-depth analysis for managing the undesirable consequences of the UMPs, including the determination of the interplay between different pools of power.",
publisher = "Cham : Springer",
journal = "Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact",
booktitle = "Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront",
pages = "153-164",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13"
}
Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Vujošević, M.. (2018). Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront. in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact
Cham : Springer., 153-164.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13
Zeković S, Maričić T, Vujošević M. Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront. in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact. 2018;:153-164.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13 .
Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Vujošević, Miodrag, "Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: example of Belgrade Waterfront" in Technologies for development: from innovation to social impact (2018):153-164,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13 . .
17

The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia

Kovachev, Atanas; Slaev, Aleksandar D.; Zeković, Slavka; Maričić, Tamara; Daskalova, Diliana

(Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar D.
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Daskalova, Diliana
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/295
AB  - This paper studies the changing roles of planning and the market in the context of urban growth and suburbanization in the capitals of Serbia and Bulgaria, specifically with regard to the socio-economic changes experienced in Southeast Europe over the past decades. With a focus on the post-socialist period, the work also examines specific features of the socialist period, so as to make important distinctions between the two. The research question in this paper is: Is planning or the market responsible for the form of growth that has occurred in Sofia and Belgrade? One methodological problem for the study is that in reality, most urban processes are to a degree both market driven and centrally planned. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish between the distinct roles and outcomes of planning and the market. To solve this problem, the paper analyzes situations in which either planning or the market is dominant, so as to be able to clearly determine the impact of each mechanism on the resultant development. The paper concludes that urban growth and suburbanization are generally engendered by market forces, whereas the role of planning is to improve and refine the action of the market. When planning ignores the market, it results in failed or inefficient urban forms. However when planning is absent, urban development fails to meet reasonable standards.
PB  - Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia
VL  - 1
IS  - 37
SP  - 34
EP  - 41
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT1737034K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kovachev, Atanas and Slaev, Aleksandar D. and Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara and Daskalova, Diliana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper studies the changing roles of planning and the market in the context of urban growth and suburbanization in the capitals of Serbia and Bulgaria, specifically with regard to the socio-economic changes experienced in Southeast Europe over the past decades. With a focus on the post-socialist period, the work also examines specific features of the socialist period, so as to make important distinctions between the two. The research question in this paper is: Is planning or the market responsible for the form of growth that has occurred in Sofia and Belgrade? One methodological problem for the study is that in reality, most urban processes are to a degree both market driven and centrally planned. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish between the distinct roles and outcomes of planning and the market. To solve this problem, the paper analyzes situations in which either planning or the market is dominant, so as to be able to clearly determine the impact of each mechanism on the resultant development. The paper concludes that urban growth and suburbanization are generally engendered by market forces, whereas the role of planning is to improve and refine the action of the market. When planning ignores the market, it results in failed or inefficient urban forms. However when planning is absent, urban development fails to meet reasonable standards.",
publisher = "Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia",
volume = "1",
number = "37",
pages = "34-41",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT1737034K"
}
Kovachev, A., Slaev, A. D., Zeković, S., Maričić, T.,& Daskalova, D.. (2017). The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia. in Spatium
Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia., 1(37), 34-41.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737034K
Kovachev A, Slaev AD, Zeković S, Maričić T, Daskalova D. The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia. in Spatium. 2017;1(37):34-41.
doi:10.2298/SPAT1737034K .
Kovachev, Atanas, Slaev, Aleksandar D., Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, Daskalova, Diliana, "The changing roles of planning and the market in the processes of urban growth in Belgrade and Sofia" in Spatium, 1, no. 37 (2017):34-41,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737034K . .
2
4

Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market

Kovachev, Atanas; Slaev, Aleksandar D.; Nikolov, Petar; Daskalova, Diliana; Vujošević, Miodrag; Zeković, Slavka; Petrić, Jasna; Krunić, Nikola; Maričić, Tamara; Bajić, Tanja; Salvemini, Mauro; Berardi, Laura

(Varna : Varna free university, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Kovachev, Atanas
AU  - Slaev, Aleksandar D.
AU  - Nikolov, Petar
AU  - Daskalova, Diliana
AU  - Vujošević, Miodrag
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Petrić, Jasna
AU  - Krunić, Nikola
AU  - Maričić, Tamara
AU  - Bajić, Tanja
AU  - Salvemini, Mauro
AU  - Berardi, Laura
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/413
AB  - The paper explores the problems of sustainable and resilient development of the cities in Eastern and South-east Europe on the examples of Sofia, Belgrade and Rome and their urban regions. The research draws comparisons to the forms, patterns and mechanisms of their development.
PB  - Varna : Varna free university
PB  - Belgrade: Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1
T1  - Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market
SP  - 13
EP  - 136
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Kovachev, Atanas and Slaev, Aleksandar D. and Nikolov, Petar and Daskalova, Diliana and Vujošević, Miodrag and Zeković, Slavka and Petrić, Jasna and Krunić, Nikola and Maričić, Tamara and Bajić, Tanja and Salvemini, Mauro and Berardi, Laura",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The paper explores the problems of sustainable and resilient development of the cities in Eastern and South-east Europe on the examples of Sofia, Belgrade and Rome and their urban regions. The research draws comparisons to the forms, patterns and mechanisms of their development.",
publisher = "Varna : Varna free university, Belgrade: Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1",
booktitle = "Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market",
pages = "13-136",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413"
}
Kovachev, A., Slaev, A. D., Nikolov, P., Daskalova, D., Vujošević, M., Zeković, S., Petrić, J., Krunić, N., Maričić, T., Bajić, T., Salvemini, M.,& Berardi, L.. (2016). Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1
Varna : Varna free university., 13-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413
Kovachev A, Slaev AD, Nikolov P, Daskalova D, Vujošević M, Zeković S, Petrić J, Krunić N, Maričić T, Bajić T, Salvemini M, Berardi L. Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market. in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1. 2016;:13-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413 .
Kovachev, Atanas, Slaev, Aleksandar D., Nikolov, Petar, Daskalova, Diliana, Vujošević, Miodrag, Zeković, Slavka, Petrić, Jasna, Krunić, Nikola, Maričić, Tamara, Bajić, Tanja, Salvemini, Mauro, Berardi, Laura, "Urban Growth and Urbanization of Sofiа, Belgrade and Rome: the Interaction between Urban Planning and the Market" in Forms of urban growth in South-Eastern Europe: transitioning towards urban resilience and sustainability. Volumen 1 (2016):13-136,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_413 .