TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
AB  - The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe
IS  - 48
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT220603009H
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe",
number = "48",
pages = "1-10",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT220603009H"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2022). Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.(48), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium. 2022;(48):1-10.
doi:10.2298/SPAT220603009H .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe" in Spatium, no. 48 (2022):1-10,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/507
AB  - The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.
PB  - Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia
IS  - 41
SP  - 14
EP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The paper explores deindustrialization as the main development problem in Serbia and examines the possibilities for a new industrial policy and its implementation. The aim of the paper is to re-examine the process of deindustrialization in Serbia (its causes and consequences), and to give useful suggestions related to Serbia's existing strategy of longterm industrial development until 2020 and to new industrial policies. Addressing the deindustrialization process is an issue of developmental and economic policy. A reindustrialization strategy or a new industrial policy could be one answer, and this has to be addressed if the share of industry in the GDP is to increase. Both qualitative and datagiven approaches have been applied to the analysis of deindustrialization and to the question of how to improve the conceptual framework for reindustrialization in Serbia. Also, some recommendations to the on going national reindustrialization strategy, or the “smart specialization strategies” are made.",
publisher = "Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia",
number = "41",
pages = "14-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2019). Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium
Institute of architecture and urban& spatial planning of Serbia.(41), 14-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia. in Spatium. 2019;(41):14-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507 .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Rethinking deindustrialization, and the reindustrialization policy in Serbia" in Spatium, no. 41 (2019):14-22,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_507 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/404
AB  - U radu se pošlo od potrebe da se oceni moguća dinamika razvoja Srbije do kraja ove decenije. Naime, nakon brzog ekonomskog rasta u periodu 2001–2008. godina, u periodu krize, poslednjih šest godina, Srbija je imala (prosečan) nulti privredni rast.  Brojni su problemi i razvojna ograničenja sa kojima se domaća privreda suočava u ovom trenutku. Osim demografskih problema, to su problemi javne potrošnje, spoljnotrgovinske razmene, unutrašnjeg i spoljnog duga, problem lošeg privrednog ambijenta i vođenje neadekvatne ekonomske i razvojne politike. Zbog navedenih razloga, a uzimajući u obzir relevantne projekcije razvoja za naredni period, došlo se do procene da će do kraja ove decenije privredni rast biti spor, tj. između 2 i 3% mereno rastom BDP-a prosečno godišnje. Ovakva dinamika rasta kvalitativno bi rezultirala daljim zaostajanjem za zemljama u tranziciji kao i za kakvim-takvim držanjem koraka prema razvijenim zemljama.
AB  - The paper started with the need to access the possible development dynamism of Serbia until the end of this decade. Namely, after speedy economic growth in the period 2001-2008, in the crisis period, during the last six years, Serbia faced with zero rate of growth. There are numerous development problems and limits which domestic economy is faced with in this moment. These are demographic problems, problems of public consumption, foreign exchange problems, internal and external debt, non - stimulative business environment and non - adequate economic and development policies. Taking into consideration several available, relevant development projections for the future period, it was accessed that rate of growth would be 2-3% as average GDP growth. In qualitative terms such a dynamic means that Serbia in the future would lag behind other economies in transition and at the same time development distance with developed countries would stay as it is now.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
T2  - Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji – Knjiga 2
T1  - Usporeni rast i razvoj Srbije – uzroci i posledice
T1  - Slow Growth and Development of Serbia till 2020 – Factors and Outcomes
SP  - 79
EP  - 106
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_404
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2014",
abstract = "U radu se pošlo od potrebe da se oceni moguća dinamika razvoja Srbije do kraja ove decenije. Naime, nakon brzog ekonomskog rasta u periodu 2001–2008. godina, u periodu krize, poslednjih šest godina, Srbija je imala (prosečan) nulti privredni rast.  Brojni su problemi i razvojna ograničenja sa kojima se domaća privreda suočava u ovom trenutku. Osim demografskih problema, to su problemi javne potrošnje, spoljnotrgovinske razmene, unutrašnjeg i spoljnog duga, problem lošeg privrednog ambijenta i vođenje neadekvatne ekonomske i razvojne politike. Zbog navedenih razloga, a uzimajući u obzir relevantne projekcije razvoja za naredni period, došlo se do procene da će do kraja ove decenije privredni rast biti spor, tj. između 2 i 3% mereno rastom BDP-a prosečno godišnje. Ovakva dinamika rasta kvalitativno bi rezultirala daljim zaostajanjem za zemljama u tranziciji kao i za kakvim-takvim držanjem koraka prema razvijenim zemljama., The paper started with the need to access the possible development dynamism of Serbia until the end of this decade. Namely, after speedy economic growth in the period 2001-2008, in the crisis period, during the last six years, Serbia faced with zero rate of growth. There are numerous development problems and limits which domestic economy is faced with in this moment. These are demographic problems, problems of public consumption, foreign exchange problems, internal and external debt, non - stimulative business environment and non - adequate economic and development policies. Taking into consideration several available, relevant development projections for the future period, it was accessed that rate of growth would be 2-3% as average GDP growth. In qualitative terms such a dynamic means that Serbia in the future would lag behind other economies in transition and at the same time development distance with developed countries would stay as it is now.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije",
journal = "Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji – Knjiga 2",
booktitle = "Usporeni rast i razvoj Srbije – uzroci i posledice, Slow Growth and Development of Serbia till 2020 – Factors and Outcomes",
pages = "79-106",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_404"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2014). Usporeni rast i razvoj Srbije – uzroci i posledice. in Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji – Knjiga 2
Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije., 79-106.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_404

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Usporeni rast i razvoj Srbije – uzroci i posledice. in Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji – Knjiga 2. 2014;:79-106.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_404 .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Usporeni rast i razvoj Srbije – uzroci i posledice" in Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji – Knjiga 2 (2014):79-106,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_404 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/403
AB  - Countries of Eastern and Central Europe have introduced market reform on the basis of the so - called shock therapy, with inevitable transitory drop in GDP, standard of living and industrial production. Those most advanced economies, after more than a decade of restructuring process, have succeeded in becoming competitive on the global market. Serbia was also facing problems with deindustrialization when it started late with market reforms, although the drop was not so deep because the previous economic crisis during the 1990s had already hampered the national economy. Deindustrialization caused problems such as increasing unemployment, balance of payment deficit and finally nonsustainable development, which became more serious during the global crisis. The collapse of industrial development is the "Achilles heel" of the Serbian economy. So, reindustrialization is seen as a vehicle for overcoming the crisis and, at the same time, for creating sustainable development. It is also the key to the recovery of the national economy, to improving its competitiveness and creating dynamic, sustainable and inclusive economic growth, together with increasing employment and standard of living.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia
C3  - Conference Proceedings / 2nd International Scientific Conference Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance - RESPAG 2013, Belgrade, May 22-25, 2013
T1  - Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia
SP  - 410
EP  - 421
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_403
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Countries of Eastern and Central Europe have introduced market reform on the basis of the so - called shock therapy, with inevitable transitory drop in GDP, standard of living and industrial production. Those most advanced economies, after more than a decade of restructuring process, have succeeded in becoming competitive on the global market. Serbia was also facing problems with deindustrialization when it started late with market reforms, although the drop was not so deep because the previous economic crisis during the 1990s had already hampered the national economy. Deindustrialization caused problems such as increasing unemployment, balance of payment deficit and finally nonsustainable development, which became more serious during the global crisis. The collapse of industrial development is the "Achilles heel" of the Serbian economy. So, reindustrialization is seen as a vehicle for overcoming the crisis and, at the same time, for creating sustainable development. It is also the key to the recovery of the national economy, to improving its competitiveness and creating dynamic, sustainable and inclusive economic growth, together with increasing employment and standard of living.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia",
journal = "Conference Proceedings / 2nd International Scientific Conference Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance - RESPAG 2013, Belgrade, May 22-25, 2013",
title = "Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia",
pages = "410-421",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_403"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2013). Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia. in Conference Proceedings / 2nd International Scientific Conference Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance - RESPAG 2013, Belgrade, May 22-25, 2013
Belgrade : Institute of architecture and urban & spatial planning of Serbia., 410-421.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_403

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia. in Conference Proceedings / 2nd International Scientific Conference Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance - RESPAG 2013, Belgrade, May 22-25, 2013. 2013;:410-421.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_403 .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Effects of the process of deindustrialization and the concept of reindustrialization strategy of Serbia" in Conference Proceedings / 2nd International Scientific Conference Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance - RESPAG 2013, Belgrade, May 22-25, 2013 (2013):410-421,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_403 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/392
AB  - U radu su prikazani rezultati kritičke evaluacije Programa implementacije PPRS 2011–2015.godine (PIPPRS) sa stanovišta izbora, usklađenosti i teritorijalne integrisanosti predloženih strateških (ekonomskih) projekata sa projektima predviđenim u Zakonu o budžetu Republike Srbije za 2012. godinu, Nacionalnom investicionom planu (NIP) i Operativnom programu ekonomskog razvoja 2012–2013.godine, kao i predlog smernica za prevazilaženje postojećeg implementacionog i upravljačkog jaza i unapređenje pristupa implementacije strateških projekata koji je utemeljen na koherentnoj teorijsko-metodološkoj osnovi i novijim iskustvima.  S obzirom  na to da PIPPRS ne elaborira instrumentarijum za teritorijalnu integraciju opštih ekonomskih, sektorskih politika i strateških projekata, predlaže se primena evropskih okvira politika (posebno Europe 2020 Strategy, Cohesion policy 2014–2020, izmenjena Lisabonska strategija, i dr.) i  smernice o upravljanju projektnog ciklusa. Konstatuje se da je za evaluaciju i teritorijalno usklađivanje strateških projekata na različitim prostornim nivoima planiranja i upravljanja potrebna primena novog efikasnog alata – teritorijalno integrisanog investiranja (ITI - Territorial Integrated Invesment). Ovaj alat je veoma značajan za implementaciju strateških projekata zasnovanih na programiranju i decentralizovanom upravljanju razvojne pomoći EU (IPA instrumenata), odnosno za teritorijalno integrisanu implementaciju projekata utvrđenih u dokumentima: Okviri strateške usklađenosti, NIP, prostornim planovima, razvojnim planovima, opštim razvojnim i sektorskim politikama, na različitim prostornim nivoima.
AB  - This paper presents the results of critical evaluation of the Programme implementation of SPRS 2011-2015 (PIPPRS) from the point of selection, compliance  and territorial integration of the proposed strategic (economic) projects with the projects wich are envisaged in the Budget Law of the Republic of Serbia in 2012, the National Investment Plan (NIP), The Operational Programme for Economic Development 2012 – 2013, and the proposal of guidelines to overcome the existing implementation and management gaps and improvement of access to the implementation of strategic projects based on a coherent theoretical and methodological framework, and recent experiences. Since PIPPRS not elaborates instruments for territorial integration of general economic, sectoral policies and strategic projects, here is proposed the implementation of European policy framework (in particular the Europe 2020 Strategy, Cohesion policy 2014-2020, revisited Lisbon Strategy, and others.) and Guidelines for Project Management Cycle.. It is estimated that is for the evaluation and territorial alignment of strategic projects at different spatial levels of planning and implementation necessary the using of new effective tools - Territorial Integrated Invesment (ITI). This tool is very important for the implementation of strategic projects which are based on the programming, and decentralized management of development assistence (IPA instruments) and territorially integrated implementation of identified projects in document of Strategic framework compliance, NIP, spatial plans, strategic development plans, general development and sectoral policies on different territorial levels.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
T2  - Održivi prostorni razvoj Podunavlja u Srbiji – knjiga 1
T1  - Evaluacija i integrisanost strateških projekata u okvire PPRS: primer Programa implementacije PPRS
T1  - The evaluation and integration of strategic projects in framework of the SPRS: example of implementation programme of SPRS
SP  - 195
EP  - 226
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_392
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Hadžić, Miroljub",
year = "2012",
abstract = "U radu su prikazani rezultati kritičke evaluacije Programa implementacije PPRS 2011–2015.godine (PIPPRS) sa stanovišta izbora, usklađenosti i teritorijalne integrisanosti predloženih strateških (ekonomskih) projekata sa projektima predviđenim u Zakonu o budžetu Republike Srbije za 2012. godinu, Nacionalnom investicionom planu (NIP) i Operativnom programu ekonomskog razvoja 2012–2013.godine, kao i predlog smernica za prevazilaženje postojećeg implementacionog i upravljačkog jaza i unapređenje pristupa implementacije strateških projekata koji je utemeljen na koherentnoj teorijsko-metodološkoj osnovi i novijim iskustvima.  S obzirom  na to da PIPPRS ne elaborira instrumentarijum za teritorijalnu integraciju opštih ekonomskih, sektorskih politika i strateških projekata, predlaže se primena evropskih okvira politika (posebno Europe 2020 Strategy, Cohesion policy 2014–2020, izmenjena Lisabonska strategija, i dr.) i  smernice o upravljanju projektnog ciklusa. Konstatuje se da je za evaluaciju i teritorijalno usklađivanje strateških projekata na različitim prostornim nivoima planiranja i upravljanja potrebna primena novog efikasnog alata – teritorijalno integrisanog investiranja (ITI - Territorial Integrated Invesment). Ovaj alat je veoma značajan za implementaciju strateških projekata zasnovanih na programiranju i decentralizovanom upravljanju razvojne pomoći EU (IPA instrumenata), odnosno za teritorijalno integrisanu implementaciju projekata utvrđenih u dokumentima: Okviri strateške usklađenosti, NIP, prostornim planovima, razvojnim planovima, opštim razvojnim i sektorskim politikama, na različitim prostornim nivoima., This paper presents the results of critical evaluation of the Programme implementation of SPRS 2011-2015 (PIPPRS) from the point of selection, compliance  and territorial integration of the proposed strategic (economic) projects with the projects wich are envisaged in the Budget Law of the Republic of Serbia in 2012, the National Investment Plan (NIP), The Operational Programme for Economic Development 2012 – 2013, and the proposal of guidelines to overcome the existing implementation and management gaps and improvement of access to the implementation of strategic projects based on a coherent theoretical and methodological framework, and recent experiences. Since PIPPRS not elaborates instruments for territorial integration of general economic, sectoral policies and strategic projects, here is proposed the implementation of European policy framework (in particular the Europe 2020 Strategy, Cohesion policy 2014-2020, revisited Lisbon Strategy, and others.) and Guidelines for Project Management Cycle.. It is estimated that is for the evaluation and territorial alignment of strategic projects at different spatial levels of planning and implementation necessary the using of new effective tools - Territorial Integrated Invesment (ITI). This tool is very important for the implementation of strategic projects which are based on the programming, and decentralized management of development assistence (IPA instruments) and territorially integrated implementation of identified projects in document of Strategic framework compliance, NIP, spatial plans, strategic development plans, general development and sectoral policies on different territorial levels.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije",
journal = "Održivi prostorni razvoj Podunavlja u Srbiji – knjiga 1",
booktitle = "Evaluacija i integrisanost strateških projekata u okvire PPRS: primer Programa implementacije PPRS, The evaluation and integration of strategic projects in framework of the SPRS: example of implementation programme of SPRS",
pages = "195-226",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_392"
}

Zeković, S.,& Hadžić, M.. (2012). Evaluacija i integrisanost strateških projekata u okvire PPRS: primer Programa implementacije PPRS. in Održivi prostorni razvoj Podunavlja u Srbiji – knjiga 1
Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije., 195-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_392

Zeković S, Hadžić M. Evaluacija i integrisanost strateških projekata u okvire PPRS: primer Programa implementacije PPRS. in Održivi prostorni razvoj Podunavlja u Srbiji – knjiga 1. 2012;:195-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_392 .

Zeković, Slavka, Hadžić, Miroljub, "Evaluacija i integrisanost strateških projekata u okvire PPRS: primer Programa implementacije PPRS" in Održivi prostorni razvoj Podunavlja u Srbiji – knjiga 1 (2012):195-226,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_392 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/441
AB  - Main subject of this paper is the analysis of existing development documents in Republic of Serbia. Missing of development strategy and other relevant development and planning documents causes suboptimal results in last years in Serbian economy. In spite the fact that results on GDP growth are positive, it is obvious  that it is unsustainable term in long term, as there is permanent generating of two imbalances : internal, expressed in fiscal deficits, and external, expressed in large and growing balance of payment deficit and specially in current account deficit. Reforms that has been implemented in Serbia in last years are often unconsistent, even in some cases confronted each to other. Under such conditions, when we have "wild" market economy, without effective regulation of market mechanism, we adopted Development Strategy of Serbia till 2010. Critical analysis of this document and alternative solutions and scenarios of sustainable development in Serbia in following years are the key part of this paper.
PB  - Beograd : Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Centar za izdavačku delatnost
PB  - Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
T2  - Održivi razvoj u SCG: Institucionalno prilagođavanje rešenjima i praksi u EU
T1  - Strategija privrednog razvoja Srbije do 2010.godine - kritički osvrt
T1  - Development Strategy of Republic of Serbia - Critical Analysis
SP  - 21
EP  - 49
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_441
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Zeković, Slavka and Hadžić, Miroljub",
year = "2006",
abstract = "Main subject of this paper is the analysis of existing development documents in Republic of Serbia. Missing of development strategy and other relevant development and planning documents causes suboptimal results in last years in Serbian economy. In spite the fact that results on GDP growth are positive, it is obvious  that it is unsustainable term in long term, as there is permanent generating of two imbalances : internal, expressed in fiscal deficits, and external, expressed in large and growing balance of payment deficit and specially in current account deficit. Reforms that has been implemented in Serbia in last years are often unconsistent, even in some cases confronted each to other. Under such conditions, when we have "wild" market economy, without effective regulation of market mechanism, we adopted Development Strategy of Serbia till 2010. Critical analysis of this document and alternative solutions and scenarios of sustainable development in Serbia in following years are the key part of this paper.",
publisher = "Beograd : Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Centar za izdavačku delatnost, Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije",
journal = "Održivi razvoj u SCG: Institucionalno prilagođavanje rešenjima i praksi u EU",
booktitle = "Strategija privrednog razvoja Srbije do 2010.godine - kritički osvrt, Development Strategy of Republic of Serbia - Critical Analysis",
pages = "21-49",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_441"
}

Zeković, S.,& Hadžić, M.. (2006). Strategija privrednog razvoja Srbije do 2010.godine - kritički osvrt. in Održivi razvoj u SCG: Institucionalno prilagođavanje rešenjima i praksi u EU
Beograd : Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Centar za izdavačku delatnost., 21-49.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_441

Zeković S, Hadžić M. Strategija privrednog razvoja Srbije do 2010.godine - kritički osvrt. in Održivi razvoj u SCG: Institucionalno prilagođavanje rešenjima i praksi u EU. 2006;:21-49.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_441 .

Zeković, Slavka, Hadžić, Miroljub, "Strategija privrednog razvoja Srbije do 2010.godine - kritički osvrt" in Održivi razvoj u SCG: Institucionalno prilagođavanje rešenjima i praksi u EU (2006):21-49,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_441 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2005
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/80
AB  - This paper offers a critical analysis of the strategic framework for long-term economic development of Serbia, of the role of strategic development in the success of the transition process, and the consequences of the lack of a development strategy. The strategy of long-term economic development of Serbia, as a programme intended to designate the economic and development policy of the state, is analyzed with the aim of finding an acceptable formulation of development strategy. The authors consider various approaches and propose a strategy for Serbia in the period of transition towards market economy. They also point out that, in the period of transition from a government-planned towards a market economy, strategy should be given greater importance than in periods that do not represent turning points, because of the greater possibility of incorrect policy making, potential conflicts of interest groups, reaching sustainable development, and maximizing prosperity. The authors take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the radical and of the gradualist approach to transition and propose formulating a development strategy that would contain combined elements of plan and market mechanisms. They believe that the process of transition lacks a clear development strategy, and that the quality of the existing development strategy of Serbia until 2010 is such that it cannot be understood as a serious approach to the transition issue. The authors stress the consequences of undergoing transition without a development strategy, that include inappropriate dynamic and sequence of reforms; a lack of coordination between development policy, macroeconomic policy, market reforms, and spatial planning policy; higher costs of transition, insufficient rate of economic growth, etc. They offer proposals for a comprehensive development framework (CDF) and for strategic planning of territorial industrial development.
PB  - Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia
IS  - 12
SP  - 1
EP  - 11
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT0512001H
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2005",
abstract = "This paper offers a critical analysis of the strategic framework for long-term economic development of Serbia, of the role of strategic development in the success of the transition process, and the consequences of the lack of a development strategy. The strategy of long-term economic development of Serbia, as a programme intended to designate the economic and development policy of the state, is analyzed with the aim of finding an acceptable formulation of development strategy. The authors consider various approaches and propose a strategy for Serbia in the period of transition towards market economy. They also point out that, in the period of transition from a government-planned towards a market economy, strategy should be given greater importance than in periods that do not represent turning points, because of the greater possibility of incorrect policy making, potential conflicts of interest groups, reaching sustainable development, and maximizing prosperity. The authors take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the radical and of the gradualist approach to transition and propose formulating a development strategy that would contain combined elements of plan and market mechanisms. They believe that the process of transition lacks a clear development strategy, and that the quality of the existing development strategy of Serbia until 2010 is such that it cannot be understood as a serious approach to the transition issue. The authors stress the consequences of undergoing transition without a development strategy, that include inappropriate dynamic and sequence of reforms; a lack of coordination between development policy, macroeconomic policy, market reforms, and spatial planning policy; higher costs of transition, insufficient rate of economic growth, etc. They offer proposals for a comprehensive development framework (CDF) and for strategic planning of territorial industrial development.",
publisher = "Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia",
number = "12",
pages = "1-11",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT0512001H"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2005). Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia. in Spatium
Institute of Architecture, Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.(12), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT0512001H

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia. in Spatium. 2005;(12):1-11.
doi:10.2298/SPAT0512001H .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia" in Spatium, no. 12 (2005):1-11,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT0512001H . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/423
AB  - The paper offers a critical analysis of the strategic framework for long-term economic development of Serbia, of the role of strategic development in the success of the transition process, and the consequences of the lack of a development strategy. The strategy of long-term economic development of Serbia, as a programe intended to designate the economic and development policy of the state, is analysed with the aim of finding an acceptable formulation of development strategy. The authors consider various approaches and propose a strategy for Serbia in the period of transition towards market economy. They also point out that, in the period of transition from a government-planned towards a market economy, strategy should be given greater importance in period that do not represent turning points, because of the greater possibility of incorrect policy making, potential conflicts of interest groups, reaching sustainable development, and maximizing prosperity. The authors take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the radical and of the gradualist approach to transition and propose formulating a development strategy that would contain combined elements of plan and market mechanism. They believe that the process of transition lacks a clear development strategy, and that the quality of the existing development strategy of Serbia until 2010 is such it cannot be understood as a serious approach to the transition issue. The authors stress the consequences of underground transition without a development strategy, that include inappropriate dynamic and sequence of reforms< a lack of coordination between development policy, macroeconomic policy, market reforms, and spatial planning policy< higher costs of transition, insufficient rate of economic growth, etc. They offer proposals for a comprehensive development framework (CDF) and for strategic planning of territorial industrial development.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije
T2  - Strateški okviri za održivi razvoj Srbije
T1  - Održivi privredni razvoj Srbije
T1  - Sustainable economy development of Serbia
SP  - 89
EP  - 100
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_423
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2004",
abstract = "The paper offers a critical analysis of the strategic framework for long-term economic development of Serbia, of the role of strategic development in the success of the transition process, and the consequences of the lack of a development strategy. The strategy of long-term economic development of Serbia, as a programe intended to designate the economic and development policy of the state, is analysed with the aim of finding an acceptable formulation of development strategy. The authors consider various approaches and propose a strategy for Serbia in the period of transition towards market economy. They also point out that, in the period of transition from a government-planned towards a market economy, strategy should be given greater importance in period that do not represent turning points, because of the greater possibility of incorrect policy making, potential conflicts of interest groups, reaching sustainable development, and maximizing prosperity. The authors take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the radical and of the gradualist approach to transition and propose formulating a development strategy that would contain combined elements of plan and market mechanism. They believe that the process of transition lacks a clear development strategy, and that the quality of the existing development strategy of Serbia until 2010 is such it cannot be understood as a serious approach to the transition issue. The authors stress the consequences of underground transition without a development strategy, that include inappropriate dynamic and sequence of reforms< a lack of coordination between development policy, macroeconomic policy, market reforms, and spatial planning policy< higher costs of transition, insufficient rate of economic growth, etc. They offer proposals for a comprehensive development framework (CDF) and for strategic planning of territorial industrial development.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije",
journal = "Strateški okviri za održivi razvoj Srbije",
booktitle = "Održivi privredni razvoj Srbije, Sustainable economy development of Serbia",
pages = "89-100",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_423"
}

Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2004). Održivi privredni razvoj Srbije. in Strateški okviri za održivi razvoj Srbije
Beograd : Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije., 89-100.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_423

Hadžić M, Zeković S. Održivi privredni razvoj Srbije. in Strateški okviri za održivi razvoj Srbije. 2004;:89-100.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_423 .

Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Održivi privredni razvoj Srbije" in Strateški okviri za održivi razvoj Srbije (2004):89-100,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_423 .