RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning
Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process

Authorized Users Only
2019
Authors
Danilović Hristić, Nataša
Stefanović, Nebojša
Book part (Published version)
,
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The quality of planning of space and demands of the public interest can only be provided within a democratic culture. Public insight and hearings, according to the professional public, have often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure for presenting the planning document in its rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, it does not prevent the local authority from organizing more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of citizens, urban planners should include them much earlier than the public insight, i.e. presentation of the already formed solutions, but rather in the concept phase. Implementation with a satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure should be provided. Some participation techniques are interviewing, organizing opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on spe...cific topics, mapping common goals, identifying the opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, and presenting what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, since citizens know their living environment the best, they should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating problems and needs and reacting to certain topics, thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such an event and been encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options have become convinced of its value. The final solutions, or the compromises, should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.

Keywords:
public insight / community / democracy / inclusivity / participation
Source:
Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City, 2019, 179-191
Publisher:
  • Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Note:
  • Urednici: Vaništa Lazarević, E., Vukmirović, M., Krstić-Furundžić, A., Đukić, A.

ISBN: 978-1-5275-2048-6

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496
URI
https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/496
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Group
RAUmPlan
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Danilović Hristić, Nataša
AU  - Stefanović, Nebojša
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/496
AB  - The quality of planning of space and demands of the public interest can only be provided within a democratic culture. Public insight and hearings, according to the professional public, have often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure for presenting the planning document in its rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, it does not prevent the local authority from organizing more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of citizens, urban planners should include them much earlier than the public insight, i.e. presentation of the already formed solutions, but rather in the concept phase. Implementation with a satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure should be provided. Some participation techniques are interviewing, organizing opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, identifying the opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, and presenting what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, since citizens know their living environment the best, they should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating problems and needs and reacting to certain topics, thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such an event and been encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options have become convinced of its value. The final solutions, or the compromises, should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.
PB  - Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing
T2  - Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City
T1  - The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process
SP  - 179
EP  - 191
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Danilović Hristić, Nataša and Stefanović, Nebojša",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The quality of planning of space and demands of the public interest can only be provided within a democratic culture. Public insight and hearings, according to the professional public, have often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure for presenting the planning document in its rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, it does not prevent the local authority from organizing more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of citizens, urban planners should include them much earlier than the public insight, i.e. presentation of the already formed solutions, but rather in the concept phase. Implementation with a satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure should be provided. Some participation techniques are interviewing, organizing opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, identifying the opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, and presenting what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, since citizens know their living environment the best, they should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating problems and needs and reacting to certain topics, thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such an event and been encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options have become convinced of its value. The final solutions, or the compromises, should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.",
publisher = "Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing",
journal = "Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City",
booktitle = "The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process",
pages = "179-191",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496"
}
Danilović Hristić, N.,& Stefanović, N.. (2019). The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process. in Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City
Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing., 179-191.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496
Danilović Hristić N, Stefanović N. The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process. in Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City. 2019;:179-191.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496 .
Danilović Hristić, Nataša, Stefanović, Nebojša, "The Public Insight and Inclusivity in the Planning Process" in Keeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive City (2019):179-191,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceGroupsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis collectionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB