Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorDanilović Hristić, Nataša
dc.creatorStefanović, Nebojša
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-05T10:54:43Z
dc.date.available2019-06-05T10:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5275-2048-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/496
dc.description.abstractThe quality of planning of space and demands of the public interest can only be provided within a democratic culture. Public insight and hearings, according to the professional public, have often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure for presenting the planning document in its rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, it does not prevent the local authority from organizing more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of citizens, urban planners should include them much earlier than the public insight, i.e. presentation of the already formed solutions, but rather in the concept phase. Implementation with a satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure should be provided. Some participation techniques are interviewing, organizing opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, identifying the opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, and presenting what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, since citizens know their living environment the best, they should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating problems and needs and reacting to certain topics, thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such an event and been encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options have become convinced of its value. The final solutions, or the compromises, should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.en
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherNewcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishingsr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Technological Development (TD or TR)/36035/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceKeeping Up with Technologies to Create the Cognitive Citysr
dc.subjectpublic insightsr
dc.subjectcommunitysr
dc.subjectdemocracysr
dc.subjectinclusivitysr
dc.subjectparticipationsr
dc.titlePublic awareness and inclusivity in the planning processen
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dcterms.abstractДаниловић Христић, Наташа; Стефановић, Небојша;
dc.rights.holderCambridge Scholars Publishingsr
dc.citation.spage179
dc.citation.epage191
dc.citation.rankM14
dc.description.otherUrednici: Vaništa Lazarević, E., Vukmirović, M., Krstić-Furundžić, A., Đukić, A.sr
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_496
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу