Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2022
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ pa...rticipation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.
Ključne reči:
urban mega-project / urban governance / urban development / post-socialist spatial planning / Belgrade Waterfront ProjectIzvor:
Territory, Politics, Governance, 2022, 10, 4, 527-548Izdavač:
- Regional AStudies Association
- Routledge
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
ISSN: 2162-2671 (Print); 2162-268X (Online)
WoS: 000548950200001
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85088132981
Grupa
RAUmPlanTY - JOUR AU - Zeković, Slavka AU - Maričić, Tamara PY - 2022 UR - https://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/561 AB - The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs. PB - Regional AStudies Association PB - Routledge T2 - Territory, Politics, Governance T1 - Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront VL - 10 IS - 4 SP - 527 EP - 548 DO - 10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 ER -
@article{ author = "Zeković, Slavka and Maričić, Tamara", year = "2022", abstract = "The study analyses the decision-making, planning and governance (DMPG) of urban mega-projects (UMPs) and elaborates on it in a case study of real estate financialization by the Belgrade Waterfront Project (BWP). In order to systematize numerous challenges in urban planning and governance that enabled the BWP, various analytical tools are applied. This approach combines the components of qualitative ex-post analysis, critical discourse analysis and stakeholder analysis. The analyses of the legislation and the DMPG related to the BWP indicate: (1) a regulationist state-led process as a ‘top-top’ approach in governance; and (2) the existence of certain controversies in the legal and planning approaches (e.g., lex specialis for expropriation, out-sourcing of planning decisions, a closed fast-track decision-making cycle, and the alienation of public construction land free of charge). It is argued that a combination of top-down political power, international business and limited citizens’ participation shapes the BWP. Finally, an improved approach for governing UMPs is suggested which is based on greater transparency, an improved regulatory and institutional framework, as well as innovation in the urban planning and governance arrangements to facilitate challenges for ongoing UMPs.", publisher = "Regional AStudies Association, Routledge", journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance", title = "Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront", volume = "10", number = "4", pages = "527-548", doi = "10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410" }
Zeković, S.,& Maričić, T.. (2022). Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance Regional AStudies Association., 10(4), 527-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zeković S, Maričić T. Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront. in Territory, Politics, Governance. 2022;10(4):527-548. doi:10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 .
Zeković, Slavka, Maričić, Tamara, "Contemporary governance of urban mega- projects: a case study of the Belgrade waterfront" in Territory, Politics, Governance, 10, no. 4 (2022):527-548, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 . .