RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning
Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe

Thumbnail
2022
bitstream_2998.pdf (466.1Kb)
Authors
Hadžić, Miroljub
Zeković, Slavka
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE): Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro,... North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend. The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.

Keywords:
transition / reindustrialization / industrial policy / correlation analysis / South-Eastern Europe
Source:
Spatium, 2022, 48, 1-10
Publisher:
  • Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200006 (Institute of Architecture and Regional and Urban Planning of Serbia, Belgrade) (RS-200006)

DOI: 10.2298/SPAT220603009H

ISSN: 2217-8066 (online), 1450-569X (print)

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Group
RAUmPlan
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hadžić, Miroljub
AU  - Zeković, Slavka
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/744
AB  - The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
T2  - Spatium
T1  - Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe
IS  - 48
SP  - 1
EP  - 10
DO  - 10.2298/SPAT220603009H
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hadžić, Miroljub and Zeković, Slavka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is  still suffering. As an answer to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a development  approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving  a 1/5 share of the GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member countries, as well among  the candidates for membership. Some countries have continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have  succeeded in starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that achieving the goal defined is a challenge  for all. There are economists who argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper presents  a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of several countries in South Eastern Europe (SEE):  Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using a meta-analysis  in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis  using the IBM SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries considered follow the trend of  deindustrialization or reindustrialization, and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within  the GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the countries under consideration have already  fulfilled the aim of manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the same time all of the  countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend.  The paper could be useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other transitory/transitional  countries as they create reindustrialization policies in line with the EU industrial policy.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia",
journal = "Spatium",
title = "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe",
number = "48",
pages = "1-10",
doi = "10.2298/SPAT220603009H"
}
Hadžić, M.,& Zeković, S.. (2022). Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium
Belgrade : Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia.(48), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H
Hadžić M, Zeković S. Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe. in Spatium. 2022;(48):1-10.
doi:10.2298/SPAT220603009H .
Hadžić, Miroljub, Zeković, Slavka, "Is reindustrialization a realistic path? An empirical insight from South-Eastern Europe" in Spatium, no. 48 (2022):1-10,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT220603009H . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceGroupsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis collectionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB