RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning
Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   RAUmPlan
  • RAUmPlan
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process

Authorized Users Only
2016
Authors
Danilović Hristić, Nataša
Stefanović, Nebojša
Conference object (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Planning of space with all demands that are sharing an idea of the public interest can be provided only in the democratic culture. Public insight and hearing, according to the opinion of the professional public, has often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure of the presentation of the planning document in rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, also does not prevent local authority to organize more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of the citizens, urban planners should much earlier than the public insight i.e. presentation of already formed solutions, in concept phase, get in touch with citizens. Implementation with satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure, should be provided. Some of participations techniques are interviewing, organize opinion polls, workshops, insi...ghts and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, indentifying opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, as well as to present what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, the citizens knowing their living environment the best should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating to the problems and needs, reacting to certain topics and thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such event and encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options, become convinced of its value. The final solutions or the compromises should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.

Keywords:
public insight / community / democracy / inclusivity / participation
Source:
Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”, 2016, 294, 287-
Publisher:
  • Belgrade : University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture

ISBN: 978-86-7924-160-0

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_768
URI
http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/768
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' publications
Group
RAUmPlan
TY  - CONF
AU  - Danilović Hristić, Nataša
AU  - Stefanović, Nebojša
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://raumplan.iaus.ac.rs/handle/123456789/768
AB  - Planning of space with all demands that are sharing an idea of the public interest can be provided only in the democratic culture. Public insight and hearing, according to the opinion of the professional public, has often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure of the presentation of the planning document in rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, also does not prevent local authority to organize more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of the citizens, urban planners should much earlier than the public insight i.e. presentation of already formed solutions, in concept phase, get in touch with citizens. Implementation with satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure, should be provided. Some of participations techniques are interviewing, organize opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, indentifying opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, as well as to present what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, the citizens knowing their living environment the best should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating to the problems and needs, reacting to certain topics and thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such event and encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options, become convinced of its value. The final solutions or the compromises should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.
PB  - Belgrade : University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture
C3  - Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”
T1  - The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process
VL  - 294
SP  - 287
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Danilović Hristić, Nataša and Stefanović, Nebojša",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Planning of space with all demands that are sharing an idea of the public interest can be provided only in the democratic culture. Public insight and hearing, according to the opinion of the professional public, has often been wrongly directed and conducted. The legal basis, which prescribes the procedure of the presentation of the planning document in rudimentary outlines, does not provide sufficient input, however, also does not prevent local authority to organize more qualitative and productive communication with the interested individuals or groups. In order to better comprehend the real needs of the citizens, urban planners should much earlier than the public insight i.e. presentation of already formed solutions, in concept phase, get in touch with citizens. Implementation with satisfactory level of democracy, transparency, inclusivity and effectiveness of the procedure, should be provided. Some of participations techniques are interviewing, organize opinion polls, workshops, insights and meetings on specific topics, mapping common goals, indentifying opportunities and problems of the space, trying to explain the planning procedures, standards and norms, as well as to present what is required in order to raise the quality of life in the community. On the other hand, the citizens knowing their living environment the best should participate more actively in its creation, by indicating to the problems and needs, reacting to certain topics and thus assisting the professionals in shaping and committing their planning solutions. An extraordinary phenomenon is the way that people who have experienced such event and encouraged to be involved in developing and exploring ideas and options, become convinced of its value. The final solutions or the compromises should be the real reflection of the wishes, needs and standpoints of the majority of inhabitants.",
publisher = "Belgrade : University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture",
journal = "Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”",
title = "The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process",
volume = "294",
pages = "287"
}
Danilović Hristić, N.,& Stefanović, N.. (2016). The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process. in Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”
Belgrade : University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture., 294, 287.
Danilović Hristić N, Stefanović N. The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process. in Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”. 2016;294:287..
Danilović Hristić, Nataša, Stefanović, Nebojša, "The Public Insight and inclusivity in the Planning Process" in Conference Proceedings “Places and Technologies 2016”, 294 (2016):287.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceGroupsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis collectionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAUmPlan - Repository of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB